Physicochemical properties and sensory acceptability of goat’s milk fruit yogurts with mango and banana using accelerated testing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2015.03.04Keywords:
goat's milk yogurt, skimmed goat’s milk, accelerated testing, shelf life, reactions kineticsAbstract
Two types of skimmed (fat 3%) goat’s milk fruit yogurt with mango (YM) and banana (YB) were stored at temperatures of 5 °C, 15 °C and 25 °C for 72 hours. Every 24 hours the pH, titratable acidity, total solids, fat and protein were analyzed. Sensory acceptability was also evaluated with 75 yogurt frequent consumers, who responded with "yes" or "no" to the question ¿would you consume this product? At the beginning pH, acidity, total solids, fat and protein were 4.35 and 4.36; 0.76% and 0.75%; 12.71% and 13.23%; 3.2% and 3.3%; 4.4% and 4.5%, for the YM and YB respectively, meeting known standards for cow's milk yogurt: range of acidity 0.5%-1.6%, fat maximum value 15% and protein minimum value 2.7%. The sensory acceptability of the YM and the YB was high, with 88.9% and 94.7%, respectively. During storage under accelerated conditions, pH decreased to 3.88 and 3.92; titrable acidity increased to 1.1% and 0.93%; total solids, fat and protein decreased to 9.37% and 9.7%; 2.4% and 2.0%; 2.5% and 2.6%, for the YM and YB respectively, while remaining within the limits of the standards consulted. The sensory acceptability decreased to 4% and 5.33% for YM and YB respectively. Therefore the shelf life of the sensory acceptability was estimated (S.S.A) at 4°C in a rejection percentage of 25% and 50%, 69 and 49 h; 193 and 111 h, for the YM and YB respectively.References
A.O.A.C. - Association of Official Analytical Chemist (AOAC). 1995. Official Methods of Analysis of the Official Agricultural Chemist. 16th Edition. USA.
Aquilanti, V.; Mundim, K.C.; Elango, M.; Kleijn, S.; Kasai, T. 2010. Temperature dependence of chemical and biophysical rate processes: Phenomenological approach to deviations from Arrhenius law. Chem. Phys. Lett. 498: 209-2013.
Ávila-de Hernández, R.; González-Torrivilla, C. 2011. La evaluación sensorial de bebidas a base de fruta: una aproximación difusa. Universidad, Ciencia y Tecnología 15 (60): 171-182.
Bezerra, M. 2010. Caracterização físico-química, reológica e sensorial de iogurte obtido pela mistura dos leites bubalino e caprino. Dissertação de Mestrado em Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento de Tecnologias Regionais. Universidad Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Rio Grande do Norte. Brasil.
Casp, A.; Abril, J. 1999. Procesos de conservación de alimentos. Edit. A. Madrid Vicente. Mundi-Prensa. Pp. 494.
Castagnasso, H.; Miceli, E.; Dietrich, M.; Lacchini, R. 2007. Composición de leche de cabra criolla y cruza criolla x Nubian. V Congreso de Especialistas en Pequeños Rumiantes y Camélidos Sudamericanos. Argentina.
Cruz, A.G.; Walter, E.; Silva, R.; Faria, J.; Bolini, H.; Pinheiro, H.; Sant’Ana, A. 2010. Survival analysis methodology to predict the shelf-life of probiotic flavored yogurt. Food Research International 43: 1444-1448.
Curia, A.; Aguerrido, M.; Langohr, K.; Hough, G. 2005. Survival Analysis Applied to Sensory Shelf Life of Yogurts I: Argentine Formulations. Journal of Food Sci.70 (7): 442-445.
DGN (Dirección General de Normas) - MÉXICO. 2010. Norma Oficial Mexicana: NOM-181-SCFI-2010, Yogurt-Denominación, Especificaciones Fisico-químicas y Microbiológicas, Información Comercial y Métodos de Prueba.
Domagala, J. 2009. Instrumental texture, syneresis and microstructure of yoghurt prepared from goat, cow and sheep milk. Int. Journal of Food Properties 12: 605-615.
Doran, P.M. 1995. Bioprocess Engineering Principles. Elsevier Science & Technology Books. Pp. 439.
Eissa, E.; Mohamed, I.; Yagoub, A.; Babiker, E. 2010. Physicochemical, microbiological and sensory characteristics of yoghurt produced from goat milk. Livestock Research for Rural Development 22 (8). Disponible en: http://www.lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd22/8/eiss22137.htm
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2003. Norma del Codex para Leches Fermentadas: CODEX STAN 243-2003. Leche y Productos Lácteos (2da edición).
FAOSTAT, 2013. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Disponible en: http://faostat.fao.org
Frau, S.; Pece, N.; Font, G.; Paz, R. 2007. Calidad composicional de leche de cabra de raza Anglo Nubian en Santiago del Estero. Tec. Láctea Latinoamericana 48: 56-59.
Fung, L.; Arroyo, O.; Matossian, S. 2004. Elaboración tecnificada de queso con leche de cabra. III° Congreso Peruano de Producción Lechera Perú. Disponible en: http://www.produccion-animal.com.ar/produccion_caprina/leche_caprina/09-elaboracion_quesos_cabra.pdf
García, V.; Rovira, S.; Boutoial, K.; López, M. 2014. Improvements in goat milk quality: A review. Small Ruminant Research 121 (1): 51-57.
Guler-Akin, M. B.; Akin, M. S. 2007. Effects of cysteine and different incubation temperatures on the microflora, chemical composition and sensory characteristics of bio-yogurt made from goat’s milk. Food Chemistry 100 (2): 788-793.
Haenlein. G. F. W. 2004. Goat Milk in Human Nutrition. Small Ruminant Research 51 (2): 155-163.
Hough, G.; Fiszman, S. 2005. Estimación de la Vida Útil Sensorial de los Alimentos. Edit. CYTED. Madrid. España. Pp. 111.
INDECOPI (Instituto Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia y de la Protección de la Propiedad Intelectual) - PERÚ. 1998a. Norma Técnica Peruana. Ensayo de determinación de la densidad relativa – Método usual: NTP 202.008.1998.
INDECOPI (Instituto Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia y de la Protección de la Propiedad Intelectual) - PERÚ. 1998b. Norma Técnica Peruana. Ensayo de materia grasa – Técnica de Gerber: NTP 202.028.1998.
INDECOPI (Instituto Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia y de la Protección de la Propiedad Intelectual) - PERÚ. 1998c. Norma Técnica Peruana. Determinación de sólidos totales: NTP 202.118.1998.
INDECOPI (Instituto Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia y de la Protección de la Propiedad Intelectual) - PERÚ. 2008. Norma Técnica Peruana. Determinación de acidez de la leche – Método volumétrico: NTP 202.116.2008.
INDECOPI (Instituto Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia y de la Protección de la Propiedad Intelectual) - Perú. 2014. Norma Técnica Peruana. Leche y Productos Lácteos. Leches fermentadas. Yogurt. Requisitos. 5a. ed. NTP 202.092 2014.
INS (Instituto Nacional de Salud) - Perú. 2009. Tablas peruanas de composición de alimentos. MINSA-INS 8va Edición. Lima. Perú.
Johnson, M.E.; Kapoor, R.; McMahon, D.J.; McCoy, D.R.; Narasimmon, R.G. 2009. Reduction of sodium and fat levels in natural and processed cheeses: scientific and technological aspects. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Safety 8: 252-268.
Kailasapathy, K.; Harmstorf, I.; Phillips, M. 2008. Survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis ssp lactis in stirred fruit yogurts. LWT-Food Science and Technology 41: 1317-1322.
McGhee, C.E.; Jones, J.O.; Park, Y.W. 2015. Evaluation of textural and sensory characteristics of three types of low-fat goat milk ice cream. Small Ruminant Research 123: 293-300.
Moneim, A.; Rania, M.; Zakaria, A. 2011. Effects of Storage on Quality of Yoghurt Prepared from Cows' and Goat’s Milk and Pure Strains of Lactic Acid Bacteria. Journal of Science and Technology 12 (1): 136-143.
Montgomery, D.C.; Runger, G.C. 2012. Probabilidad y Estadística Aplicadas a la Ingeniería. Edit Limusa Wiley. México D.F.
Morand-Fehr, P.; Fedele, V.; Decandia, M.; Le Frileux, Y. 2007. Influence of farming and feeding systems on composition and quality of goat and sheep milk. Small Rumin. Res. 68: 20-34.
Mowlem, A. 2005. Marketing goat dairy produce in the UK. Small Rumin. Res. 60: 207-213.
OMS - Organización Mundial de la Salud. 2010. Global Health Indicator Tables and Footnotes Part 2. World Health Statistics. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/2010/en/
Nishiyama, M.; Kleijn, S.; Aquilanti, V.; Kasai, T.; 2009. Temperature dependence of respiration rates of leaves, 18O-experiments and super-Arrhenius kinetics. Chem. Phys. Lett. 482: 325-329.
Palacín, J. 2012. Efectos de recubrimientos de almidón de yuca, ácido ascórbico, n-acetil-cisteína en la calidad del plátano (Musa paradisiaca). Tesis de Maestría para optar al título de Magister en Ciencia y Tecnología de Alimentos. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Cartagena. Colombia.
Pirisi, A.; Lauret, A.; Dubeuf J.P. 2007. Basic and Incentive Payments for goat and milk in relation to quality. Small Rumin. Res. 68: 167-178.
Raynal-Ljutovac, K.; Lagriffoulb, G.; Paccardb, P.; Guilleta, I.; Chilliard, Y. 2008. Composition of goat and sheep milk products: An update. Small Rumin. Res. 79: 57-72.
Raynal-Ljutovac, K.; Pirisi, A.; Crémoux, R.; Gonzalo, C. 2007. Somatic cells of goat and sheep milk: analytical, sanitary, productive and technological aspects. Small Rumin. Res. 68: 126-144.
Ribeiro, A.C.; Ribeiro, S.D.A. 2010. Specialty products made from goat milk. Small Ruminant Research 89: 225-233.
Rojas, W.; Chacón, A.; Pineda, M. 2007. Características del yogurt batido de fresa derivadas de diferentes proporciones de leche de vaca y cabra. Agronomía Mesoamericana 18(2): 221-237.
Rosas, E.M. 2014. Elaboración de un producto lácteo fermentado a base de Morinda citlifolia L. Tesis Ingeniería de Alimentos, Universidad Veracruzana. Pp. 67. Disponible en: http://cdigital.uv.mx/bitstream/123456789/37794/1/rosaszu%C3%B1igaelizamaria.pdf
Schimidt, C.A.P.; Pereira, C.; Dos Anjos, G.; Lucas, S. D. M. 2012. Formulação e avaliação sensorial hedônica de iogurte com polpa de Acerola. Revista Eletrônica Científica Inovação e Tecnologia 1 (5): 10-14.
Senaka, C.; Evans, C.A.; Adams, M.C.; Baines, S. K. 2012. Probiotic viability and physico-chemical and sensory properties of plain and stirred fruit yogurts made from goat’s milk. Food Chemistry 135 (3): 1411-1418.
Serafeimidou, A.; Zlatanos, S.; Laskaridis, K.; Sagredos, A. 2012. Chemical characteristics, fatty acid composition and conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) content of traditional Greek yogurts. Food Chemistry 134(4): 1839-1846.
Siller-Cepeda, J.; Muy-Rangel, D.; Báez-Sañudo, M.; Araiza-Lizarde, E.; Ireta-Ojeda, A. 2009. Calidad poscosecha de cultivares de mango de maduración temprana, intermedia y tardía. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana 32 (1): 45-52.
Silva, V.H.C., Aquilanti, V.; de Oliveira, H.C.B.; Mundim, K.C. 2013. Uniform description of non-Arrhenius temperature dependence of reaction rates, and a heuristic criterion for quantum tunneling vs classical non-extensive distribution. Chemical Physics Letters 590: 201-207.
Slacanac, V.; Bozanic, R.; Hardi, J.; Rezessyne-Szabo, J.; Lucan, M.; Krstanovic, V. 2010. Nutritional and therapeutic value of fermented caprine milk. International Journal of Dairy Technology 63(2): 171-189.
Sumarmono, J.; Sulistyowati, M.; Soenarto. 2015. Fatty Acids Profiles of Fresh Milk, Yogurt and Concentrated Yogurt from Peranakan Etawah Goat Milk. Procedia Food Science 3: 216-222.
Wang, W.; Bao, Y.; Hendricks, G. M.; Guo, M. 2012. Consistency, microstructure and probiotic survivability of goats’ milk yoghurt using polymerized whey protein as a co-thickening agent. International Dairy Journal 24: 113-119.
Zare, F.; Boye, J.; Orsat, V.; Champagne, C.; Simpson, B. 2011. Microbial, physical and sensory properties of yogurt supplemented with lentil flour. Food Res. Int. 44 (8): 2482-2488.
Recibido 14 mayo 2015.
Aceptado 22 septiembre 2015.
Corresponding author: vvasquez@unitru.edu.pe (V. Vásquez-Villalobos).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. The authors retain the copyright and assign to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published information whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the First publication in this journal.
b. Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work Was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of work Published (see The Effect of Open Access).