The language model based on sensitive artificial intelligence - ChatGPT: Bibliometric analysis and possible uses in agriculture and livestock
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2023.010Keywords:
autoregressive language model, deep learning, text production, data mining, text mining, artificial intelligence, chatbotAbstract
ChatGPT adds to the list of artificial intelligence-based systems designed to perform specific tasks and answer questions by interacting with users (Apple's Siri, Amazon's Alexa, Google's Assistant and Bard, Microsoft's Cortana, IBM's Watson, Bixby from Samsung, among others). ChatGPT works using OpenAI's GPT (Generative Pretrained Transformer) language model and is capable of learning from users' preferences and behavior patterns to customize its response. ChatGPT has the potential to be applied in different fields, including education, journalism, scientific writing, communication, cell biology, and biotechnology, where there is already evidence. The aim of this work was to analyze the possible applications of ChatGPT in the agricultural and livestock industry. First, a scientometric analysis was performed with VosViewer and Bibliometrix (Bliblioshiny). 3 clusters were identified: (a) Main characteristics; (b) learning systems you use; and (c) applications. To the question: What are the main applications in which ChatGTP will revolutionize agriculture (or livestock) in the world? ChatGPT responded: (a) in the agricultural field: improvement of agricultural decision-making, optimization of agricultural production, detection and prevention of plant diseases, climate management, and supply chain management; and (b) in the livestock field: improvement of animal health and welfare, optimization of animal production, supply chain management, detection and prevention of zoonotic diseases, and climate management for animal production. ChatGPT does not scientifically support its answer, but from the analysis carried out, we find that there is enough scientific evidence to conclude, in this case, that its answers were correct. While ChatGPT does not necessarily scientifically substantiate its answers, users should. There is a lack of studies on the use of Artificial Intelligence and its relationship with ethics.
References
Agtecher (2022). How OpenAI and ChatGPT can be used in Agriculture. https://agtecher.com/es/how-openai-and-chatgpt-can-be-used-in-agriculture/
Cahan, P., & Treutlein, B. (2023). A conversation with ChatGPT on the role of computational systems biology in stem cell research. Stem Cell Reports, 18(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.12.009
Di, Y., Gao, M., Feng, F., Li, Q., & Zhang, H. (2022). A New Framework for Winter Wheat Yield Prediction Integrating Deep Learning and Bayesian Optimization. Agronomy, 12(12), 3194. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123194
Dimitriadou, E., & Lanitis, A. (2023). A critical evaluation, challenges, and future perspectives of using artificial intelligence and emerging technologies in smart classrooms. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 12.
Else, H. (2023). Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature 613, 423. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7
Ezanno, P., Picault, S., Beaunée, G., (...), Monod, H., Guégan, J.-F. (2021). Research perspectives on animal health in the era of artificial intelligence. Veterinary Research, 52(1),40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-021-00902-4
Gallardo, M., Elia, A., Thompson, R.B. (2020). Decision support systems and models for aiding irrigation and nutrient management of vegetable crops. Agricultural Water Management, 240, 106209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106209
Ganesh, A., & Kalpana, P. (2022). Future of artificial intelligence and its influence on supply chain risk management – A systematic review. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 169, 108206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108206
García, R., Aguilar, J., Toro, M., (...), Pinto, A., Rodríguez, P. (2023). Autonomic computing in a beef-production process for Precision Livestock Farming. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 31, 100425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2022.100425
Holzinger, A., Keiblinger, K., Holub, P., Zatloukal, K., Müller, H. (2023). AI for life: Trends in artificial intelligence for biotechnology. New Biotechnology, 74, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2023.02.001
Hassan, S. M., Maji, A. K., Jasiński, M., Leonowicz, Z., & Jasińska, E. (2021). Identification of Plant-Leaf Diseases Using CNN and Transfer-Learning Approach. Electronics, 10(12), 1388. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/electronics10121388
Huh, S. (2023). Issues in the 3rd year of the COVID-19 pandemic, including computer-based testing, study design, ChatGPT, journal metrics, and appreciation to reviewers. Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 20, 5.
Janzen, T. (2023). What are five ways ChatGPT will revolutionize agriculture in the U.S.? https://www.agriculture.com/news/technology/what-are-five-ways-chatgtp-will-revolutionize-agriculture-in-the-us
Ji, B., Banhazi, T., Perano, K., (...), Wang, C., Li, B. (2020). A review of measuring, assessing and mitigating heat stress in dairy cattle. Biosystems Engineering, 199, 4-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.07.009
Kumar, P., Udayakumar, A., Anbarasa Kumar, A. et al. Multiparameter optimization system with DCNN in precision agriculture for advanced irrigation planning and scheduling based on soil moisture estimation. Environ Monit Assess, 195, 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10529-3
Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating With ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 78(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149577
Reagan, K. L., Deng, S., Sheng, J., et al. (2022). Use of machine-learning algorithms to aid in the early detection of leptospirosis in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 34(4), 612-621. https://doi.org/10.1177/10406387221096781
Sadiku, M. N., Ashaolu, T. J., Ajayi-Majebi, A., & Musa, S. M. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Scientific Advances, 2(1), 5–11.
SinghA. K., BhakatC., GhoshM. K., & DuttaT. K. (2021). Technologies used at advanced dairy farms for optimizing the performance of dairy animals: A review. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 19(4), e05R01. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2021194-17801
Stokel-Walker, C., & Van Noorden, R. (2023). What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science. Nature, 614(7947), 214–216. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00340-6
Sajith, G., Srinivas, R., Golberg, A., Magner, J. (2022). Bio-inspired and artificial intelligence enabled hydro-economic model for diversified agricultural management. Agricultural Water Management, 269, 107638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107638
Stokel-Walker, C. (2023). ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature, 613, 620-621. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z
Tedeschi, L. O. (2022). ASAS-NANP symposium: Mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: The progression of data analytics and artificial intelligence in support of sustainable development in animal science. Journal of Animal Science, 100(6), skac111. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skac111
Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879
van Dis, E.A.M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., Bockting, C.L. (2023). ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224-226. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7
Uyeh, D. D., Mallipeddi, R., Park, T., Woo, S., & Ha, Y. (2022) Technological Advancements and Economics in Plant Production Systems: How to Retrofit? Front. Plant Sci., 13, 929672. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.929672
Vidyarthi, V. K., & Jain, A. (2023). Advanced Rule-Based System for Rainfall Occurrence Forecasting by Integrating Machine Learning Techniques. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(1), 04022072.
Wilkinson, J. M., Lee, M. R. F., Rivero, M. J., & Chamberlain, A. T. (2020). Some challenges and opportunities for grazing dairy cows on temperate pastures. Grass and Forage Science, 75(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12458
Wong, L-W., Tan, G. V.-H., Ooi, K.-B., Lin, B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). Artificial intelligence-driven risk management for enhancing supply chain agility: A deep-learning-based dual-stage PLS-SEM-ANN analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 2063089. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2063089
Yağ, İ., & Altan, A. (2022). Artificial Intelligence-Based Robust Hybrid Algorithm Design and Implementation for Real-Time Detection of Plant Diseases in Agricultural Environments. Biology, 11(12), 1732. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology11121732
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Scientia Agropecuaria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. The authors retain the copyright and assign to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published information whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the First publication in this journal.
b. Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work Was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of work Published (see The Effect of Open Access).
