Review Method

 

The journal Journal of Advanced Mining Modeling (JAMM) applies a double-blind peer review system, internationally recognized for its rigor, impartiality, and transparency in scientific evaluation. Under this model, authors are unaware of the reviewers’ identities, and reviewers do not know the authors’ identities, ensuring objective assessments free from institutional, personal, or professional bias.

1. Preliminary editorial review: Verification of compliance with editorial guidelines, thematic scope, and ethical policies of the journal.
2. Assignment of expert reviewers: Selection of evaluators with proven expertise in the subject area of the manuscript.
3. Technical evaluation: Assessment of originality, methodological rigor, quality of results, statistical analysis, scientific relevance, and clarity of presentation.
4. Editorial decision: Determination of acceptance, request for revisions (minor or major), or rejection of the manuscript.
5. Author revision: Submission of the revised version together with a detailed response document addressing reviewers’ comments.
6. Final evaluation and acceptance: Verification of compliance with requested revisions and final approval for publication.

The entire editorial process is conducted under strict confidentiality criteria and in accordance with international best practices in scientific publishing, following the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the transparency principles of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and the editorial standards of the Council of Science Editors (CSE). In addition, JAMM promotes the use of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licenses, ensuring integrity, traceability, and transparency in scientific communication.