Mutualism as a stabilizing effect on the population densities of two interacting species

Authors

  • Osvaldo Osuna Instituto de Física y Matemáticas, Universidad Michoacana, Ciudad Universitaria, C.P. 58040. Morelia, Mi-choacan, México.
  • Brenda Tapia-Santos Facultad de Ciencias Matemáticas, Universidad Veracruzana, Paseo Num. Ext. 112, Col. Nueva Xalapa, C.P. 91097, Veracruz, México.
  • Geiser Villavicencio-Pulido Division de Ciencias Biológicas y de la Salud, Depto. de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Autónoma Metro-politana Unidad Lerma, Av. Hidalgo Poniente No. 46, col. La Estación, 52006 Lerma de Villada, Edo. de México, México.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17268/sel.mat.2025.02.05

Keywords:

Mutualism, conditioned interaction, consumer-resources model, Allee effect, Dulac function, periodic solution

Abstract

Mathematical models are a very useful tool to understand, describe or predict the population dynamics of species interacting. Ecologists and mathematicians have extensively studied the predator-prey, victim-exploiter, competition and mutualistic relationships. However, mutualism between species has not received the same attention as the other ecological interactions. In this work, we exclude periodic solutions of three types of systems by the construction of Dulac functions. These systems can be used to describe the population dynamics of mutualistic species. The system type I includes a wide variety of mutualistic models in which both the intrinsic rate of increase and the carrying capacity of each species increase by the interaction between species.

In particular, the system type I can be applied to exclude periodic solutions of models with conditioned interactions such that mutualism occurs at low population densities and competition occurs at high population densities. The system type II includes mutualistic models that describe a consumer-resources interaction. In these models, it is assumed that the net change of benefitscosts due to the interaction depends on the densities of the recipient species and the partner one.

The system type III describes mutualistic models in which the per capita growth rate of each species is affected by a weak Allee effect. We also apply the results of this work to models mentioned in a historical list of mutualistic models provided in [1]. From the results obtained, we conclude that mutualism leads to the exclusion of periodic behaviors in the population dynamics of interacting species. Therefore, the population densities of the mutualistic species converge to an equilibrium point. Then, when the population densities oscillate, the oscillatory behaviors are transient. These results are relevant since the dynamics of mutualistic species has not been deeply characterized and the discussion about the existence of sustained oscillatory behavior in mutualistic species is relevant from an ecological perspective.

References

Hale K, Valdovinos F. Ecological theory of mutualism: Robust patterns of stability and thresholds in twospecies population models. Ecology and Evolution. 2021;11:17651–17671.

Boucher D. The ecology of mutualism. Ann REv Ecol Syst. 1982;(13):315-47.

Wolin C, Lawlor L. Models of facultative mutualism: Density effects. The American Naturalist. 1984;124:843-62.

Hernandez M. Dynamics of transitions between population interactions: a nonlinear interaction α-function defined. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1998;265:1433-40.

Hernandez M, Barradas I. Variation in the outcome of population interactions: bifurcations and catastrophes. J Math Biol. 2003;46:571-94.

Holland J, DeAngelis D, Bronstein J. Population dynamics and mutualism: Functional responses of benefits and costs. American Naturalist. 2002;159:231-44.

Holland J, DeAngelis D. A consumer–resource approach to the density-dependent population dynamics of mutualism. Ecology. 2010;91(5):1286-95.

Li Y, Xu G. Positive Periodic Solutions for an Integrodifferential Model of Mutualism. Applied Mathematics Letters. 2001;14:525-30.

Ding X, Guo D. Positive periodic solution for a Kolmogorov mutualism model with delays and impulses. Far East Journal of Applied Mathematics. 2012;65(2):123-42.

Yan X, Li W. Bifurcation and global periodic solutions in a delayed facultative mutualism system. Physica D. 2007;227:51-69.

Liu Z, Tan R, Chen Y, Chen L. On the stable periodic solutions of a delayed two-species model of facultative mutualism. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 2008;196:105-17.

Li T, Lin Q, Chen J. Positive periodic solution of a discrete commensal symbiosis model with Holling II functional response. Commun Math Biol Neurosci. 2016;2016:Article ID 22 (2016).

Xie X, Miao Z, Xue Y. Positive periodic solution of a discrete Lotka–Volterra commensal symbiosis model. Commun Math Biol Neurosci. 2015:Article ID 2 (2015).

Xue Y, Xie X, Chen F, Han R. Almost periodic solution of a discrete commensalism system. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc. 2015:Article ID 295483 (2015).

Gonzalez-Olivares E, Rojas-Palma A. Stability in Kolmogorov-type quadratic systems describing interactions among two species. A brief revision. Selecciones Matematicas. 2021;8(2):131-46.

Holland N. Population Dynamics of Mutualism. Nature Education Knowledge. 2012;3(10).

Gilpin M, Case T, Bender E. Counterintuitive oscillations in systems of competition and mutualism. The American Naturalist. 1982;119:584-8.

Wang Y, Wu H, Sun S. Persistence of pollination mutualisms in plant–pollinator–robber systems. Theoretical Population Biology. 2012;81:243-50.

Holland J, Wang Y, Sun S, DeAngelis D. Consumer-resource dynamics of indirect interactions in a mutualismparasitism food web module. Theor Ecol. 2013;6:475-93.

Revilla T, Encinas-Viso F. Dynamical Transitions in a Pollination–Herbivory Interaction: A Conflict between Mutualism and Antagonism. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(2).

Vazquez V, Barradas I. A plant - pollinator system: How learning versus cost-benefit can induce periodic oscillations. International Journal of Biomathematics. 2018;11:2.

Wang Y, Wu H, DeAngelis D. Periodic oscillation and tri-stability in mutualism systems with two consumers. J MathAnalAppl. 2022;506.

Osuna O, nor GV. On the Dulac functions. Qual Theory Dyn Syst. 2011;10:43-9.

Osuna O, Villasenor-Aguilar G. On the Dulac functions for multiply connected domains. Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations. 2013;(61):1-11.

Osuna O, Villasenor G. Some properties of the Dulac functions set. Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations. 2011;(72):1-8.

Osuna O, Rodríguez-Ceballos J, Vargas-De-Leon C, Villasé nor-Aguilar G. A note on the existence and construction of Dulac functions. Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control. 2017;22(22):431-40.

Osuna O, Vargas-De-Leon C, Villasé nor G. A note on Dulac functions for a sum of vector fields. Avanza. 2013;III:17-23.

Osuna O, Rodr´ıguez J, Vargas-De-Leon C, Villasénor G. Dulac functions for transformed vectors fields. Int J Contemp Math Sciences. 2013;8(6):291-7.

Osuna O, Vargas-De-Leon C. Construction of Dulac functions for mathematical models in population biology. International Journal of Biomathematics. 2015;8(3):1550035.

Osuna O, Villavicencio-Pulido G. Generating Dulac functions for differential equations and biological models. Avanza. 2016;VI:1-8.

Mendoza E, Osuna O, Villavicencio-Pulido G. Funciones de Dulac para modelos matemáticos de la ecología. Revista de Matemática: Teoría y Aplicaciones. 2020;27(2):1-16.

Hethcote H, Zhien M, Shengbing L. Effects of quarantine in six endemic models for infectious diseases. Mahtematical Biosciences. 2002;180:141-60.

Wright D. A simple, stable model of mutualism incorporating handling time. American Naturalist. 1989;134:664-7.

Lin Q. Allee effect increasing the final density of the species subject to the Allee effect in a Lotka–Volterra commensal symbiosis model. Adv Differ Equ. 2018;196.

Wu R, Li L, Lin Q. A Holling type commensal symbiosis model involving Allee effect. Commun Math Biol Neurosci. 2018:Article ID 6 (2018).

Gause G, Witt A. Behavior of mixed populations and the problem of natural selection. The American Naturalist. 1935;69:596-609.

Whittaker R. Symbiosis. In Communities and ecosystems MacMillan. 1975:37-42.

May RM, editor. Models of two interacting populations. Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1976.

Vandermeer JH, Goldberg DE. Population ecology: First principles. Princeton University Press; 2013.

Addicott J. Stability properties of 2-species models of mutualism: Simulation studies. Oecologia. 1981;49:42-9.

Soberon J, del Rio CM. The dynamics of a plant-pollinator interaction. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1981;91:363-78.

Dean A. A simple model of mutualism. The American Naturalist. 1983;121:409-17.

Wells H. Population equilibria and stability in plant-animal pollination systems. Journal of Theoretical Biology,. 1983;100:685-99.

Tonkyn D. Predator-mediated mutualism: Theory and tests in the Homoptera. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1986;118:15-31.

Pierce N, Young W. Lycaenid butterflies and ants: two-species stable equilibria in mutualistic, commensal, and parasitic interactions. American Naturalist. 1986;128:216-27.

Zhang Z. Mutualism or cooperation among competitors promotes coexistence and competitive ability. Ecological Modelling. 2003;164:271-82.

Neuhauser C, Fargione J. A mutualism-parasitism continuum model and its application to plant-mycorrhizae interactions. Ecological Modelling. 2004;177:337-52.

Graves W, Peckham B, Pastor J. A bifurcation analysis of a differential equations model for mutualism. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 2006;68(68):1851-72.

Fishman M, Hadany L. Plant-pollinator population dynamics. Theoretical Population Biology. 2010;78:270-7.

Kang Y, Clark R, Makiyama M, Fewell J. Mathematical modeling on obligate mutualism-Interactions between leaf-cutter ants and their fungus garden. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2011;289:116-27.

Johnson C, Amarasekare P. Competition for benefits can promote the persistence of mutualistic interactions. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2013;328:54-64.

García-Algarra J, Galeano J, Pastor J, Iriondo J, Ramasco J. Rethinking the logistic approach for population dynamics of mutualistic interactions. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2014;363:332-43.

Moore C, Catella S, Abbott K. Population dynamics of mutualism and intraspecific density dependence: How θ-logistic density dependence affects mutualistic positive feedback. Ecological Modelling,. 2018;368:191-7.

Cropp R, Norbury J. Resource-based models of mutualism. Environmental Modeling and Assessment. 2019;24:405-20.

Martignoni M, Hart M, Garnier J, Tyson R. Parasitism within mutualist guilds explains the maintenance of diversity in multi-species mutualisms. Theoretical Ecology. 2020;13:615-27.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-27

How to Cite

Osuna, O., Tapia-Santos, B., & Villavicencio-Pulido, G. (2025). Mutualism as a stabilizing effect on the population densities of two interacting species. Selecciones Matemáticas, 12(02), 326 - 343. https://doi.org/10.17268/sel.mat.2025.02.05