Food preferences of guanaco (Lama guanicoe cacsilensis) and its competence with cattle in the Calipuy National Reserve, Peru

Authors

  • Luis Linares Circulo de Investigación Agropecuaria Ecológica Uku Pacha, Trujillo
  • Virginia Linares Circulo de Investigación Agropecuaria Ecológica Uku Pacha, Trujillo
  • Gilmar Mendoza Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo
  • Freddy Peláez Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo
  • Eric Rodríguez Herbarium Truxillensis, Trujillo
  • Carlos Phum Circulo de Investigación Agropecuaria Ecológica Uku Pacha, Trujillo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2010.04.06

Keywords:

Food, preference, competence, guanaco, cattle, Calipuy National Reserve

Abstract

The objective of this research was to determine the degree of food competition between guanaco and livestock in Calipuy National Reserve. Vegetation cover (CV) was determined by a survey of vegetation and composition of diets using a micro histological technique of feces (50 guanacos, 35 cows and 25 horses). The dietary overlap was determined by Horn Index (I), food preferences by Ivlev index (E) and the diet diversity by Shannon-Weaver index (D) .We found a low - moderate food competition between the guanaco and the cattle and horses. The dietary overlap was greater during the rainy season (I=0.80 and 0.88) where forage supply was high (CV=63%) and lower during the dry season (R=0.58 and 0.64) when there were shortages of food (CV=50%). The guanaco was an intermediate selective consumer. The dietary diversity of adults increased during the dry season (D=0.62, p<0.01) including up to 70% of herbs and shrubs, showing a high flexibility in food between seasons (I=0.64) and habitats (I=0.75, p<0.01), which allowed it to minimize competition with cattle and horses, which consumed mainly grasses in both seasons (>60%) and did not show the same flexibility (I=0.90, p<0.01). Chulengos and juveniles were more sensitive to seasonal variations, its consuming a lower percentage of shrubs, but had a strong preference for small herbs.

References

Baldi, R.; Pelliza-Sbriller, A.; Elston, D.; Albon, S. 2004. High potential for competition between guanacos and sheep in Patagonia. Journal of Wildlife Management 68(4): 924-938.

Bonino, N; Pelliza, A. 1991. Composición botánica de la dieta de guanaco (Lama guanicoe) en dos ambientes contrastantes de Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Revista Ecología Austral 1: 97-102.

Cortés, A.; Miranda, E.; López-Cortés, F. 2006. Abundancia y dieta del camélido Lama guanicoe en un ambiente altoandino del norte-centro de Chile. Revista Geoecología de los Andes desérticos. La Alta Montaña del Valle del Elqui. 383-411.

Gordon, I.; Illius, A. 1994. The Functional significance of the browser–grazer dichotomy in african ruminants. Journal of Ecology 98: 167–175.

Heller, R.; Gregory, P.; Engelhardt, W. 1984. Pattern of motility and flow of digesta in the forestomach of the llama (Lama glama). Journal of Comparative Physiology B 154: 529-533.

Hofmann, R.; Stewart, D. 1972. Grazer or Browser. A classification based on the stomach structure and feeding habits of east African ruminants. Mammalia 36: 226–240.

Janis, C.; Ehrhardt, D. 1988. Correlation of relative muzzle width and relative inciso width with dietary preference in ungulates. Journal of Zoological of the Linnean Society 92: 267–284.

Jarman, P. 1974. Social organization of antelope. Behaviour 48:215–267.

Lacher, T.; Da Fonseca, G.; Valle, C.; Da Fonseca, A.1991. National and international cooperation in wildlife management and conservation at a Brazilian university. Latin American Mammalogy: History, biodiversity and conservation. 368-380.

Linares, L.; Mendoza, G.; Linares, M. 2009. Distribución y organización social del guanaco en la Reserva Nacional de Calipuy. V Congreso Mundial de Camélidos Sudamericanos. Ecuador.

Pianka, E. 1986. Ecosystem Theory and Application. Ecological phenomena in evolutionary perspective. Cap 16: 325- 336 Editorial Polunin.

Puig, S.; Videla , F.; Cona, M.; Monge, S. 2001. Use of food availability by guanacos (Lama guanicoe) and livestock in Northern Patagonia (Mendoza, Argentina). Journal of Arid Environment 47:291-308.

Puig, S.; Videla, F.; Monge, F.; Roig, V. 1996. Seasonal variations in guanaco diet (Lama guanicoe Müller 1776) and food availability in northern Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments. 34: 215–224.

Raedeke, K. 1980. Food habits of the guanaco (Lama guanicoe) of Tierra del Fuego, Chile. Journal of Turrialba 30: 177-181.

Sala, O.; Golluscio, R.; Lauenroth, W.; Soriano, A. 1989. Resource partitioning between shrubs and grasses in the Patagonia steppe. Oecologia 81: 501–505.

Sparks, D.; Malechek, J. 1968. Estimating percentage dry weight in diets using a microscopic technique. Journal of Range Management 21: 264–265.

Received: 08/10/10

Accepted: 01/12/10

Corresponding author: E-mail: vangoh1231@hotmail.com (L. Linares)

Published

2010-12-25

How to Cite

Linares, L., Linares, V., Mendoza, G., Peláez, F., Rodríguez, E., & Phum, C. (2010). Food preferences of guanaco (Lama guanicoe cacsilensis) and its competence with cattle in the Calipuy National Reserve, Peru. Scientia Agropecuaria, 1(3 y 4), 225-234. https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2010.04.06

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)