Combined effects of chemical fertilization and microbial inoculant on nutrient use efficiency and soil quality indicators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2020.03.09Palabras clave:
Microbial inoculant, chemical fertilization, nutrient efficiency, soil quality.Resumen
Microbial inoculant based on beneficial bacteria is a complementary management tool to increase vegetable production. However, its integration with chemical fertilization has been poorly studied. The present study evaluated the effects of microbial inoculant separately and in combination with chemical fertilization on lettuce under greenhouse conditions. An experiment was performed in pots using a completely randomized design. The microbial inoculant was applied at three fertilization levels. Soil response evaluated variables were: available N and P, total soil bacteria, soil enzymatic activities, and N leaching. Agronomic variables measured were: aerial biomass, chlorophyll content, and nutrient foliar contents. Microbial inoculant had a significant impact on soil total bacteria concentration. The application of reduced chemical fertilization and microbial inoculant had a similar effect in terms of soil nutrient availability and soil enzymatic activities as the complete fertilization. Nitrogen leaching was strongly dependent on chemical fertilization rate. Treatment application decreased chlorophyll concentration compared to the control. The application of microbial inoculant and chemical fertilization increased foliar N and P contents improving their uptake. The combined addition of microbial inoculant with chemical fertilization increases the bacteria concentration without altering enzymatic activities, maintaining similar soil nutrient levels and improving N and P uptake in lettuce. Future studies could be performed in lettuce to determine the impact under different growth stages and different soil conditions.
Citas
Acosta, Y.; Paolioni, J. 2005. Actividad de la enzima deshidrogenasa en un suelo calciorthids enmendado con residuos orgánicos. Agronomía Tropical 55: 217-232.
Agricen. 2020. Ag Product – SoilBuilderTM. Available in: https://www.agricen.com/products/soilbuilder.
Assainar, S.K.; Abbott, L.K.; Mickan, B.S.; et al. 2018. Response of wheat to a multiple species microbial inoculant compared to fertilizer application. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 1601.
Bargaz, A.; Lyamlouli, K.; Chtouki, M.; et al. 2018. Soil microbial resources for improving fertilizers efficiency in an integrated plant nutrient management system. Frontiers in Microbiology 9: 1606.
Calvo, P.; Watts, D.B.; Ames, R.N.; et al. 2013. Microbial-based inoculants impact nitrous oxide emissions from an incubated soil medium containing urea fertilizers. Journal of environmental quality 42: 704-712.
Calvo, P.; Nelson, L.; Kloepper, J.W. 2014. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant and Soil 383: 3-41.
Dhaliwal, S.S.; Naresh, R.K.; Mandal, A.; et al. 2019. Dynamics and transformations of micronutrients in agricultural soils as influenced by organic matter build-up: A review. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators 1: 100007.
Ferreira, C.M.H.; Soares, H.M.V.M.; Soares, E.V. 2019. Promising bacterial genera for agricultural practices: An insight on plant growth-promoting properties and microbial safety aspects. Science of The Total Environment 682: 779-799.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2006. Plant nutrition for food security: A guide for integrated nutrient management. 348 pp.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2015. World fertilizer trends and outlook to 2018. 53 pp.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2017. The future of food and agriculture – Trends and challenges. 180 pp.
García, C.; Gil, F.; Fernández, T.; et al. 2003. Técnicas de análisis de parámetros bioquímicos en suelos: Medida de actividades enzimáticas y biomasa microbiana. 371p. Ediciones Mundiprensa, Spain.
Glick, B.R. 2012. Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and applications. Scientifica 2012: 963401.
Good, A.G.; Beatty, P.H. 2011. Fertilizing nature: A tragedy of excess in the commons. PLoS Biology 9(8): e1001124.
Gvozdić, V.; Tomišić, V.; Butorac, V.; et al., 2009. Association of nitrate ion with metal cations in aqueous solution: a UV-Vis spectrometric and factor-analytical study. Croatica Chemica Acta 82(2): 553-559.
Jacoby, R.; Peukert, M.; Succurro, A.; et al. 2017. The Role of Soil Microorganisms in plant mineral nutrition- Current knowledge and future directions. Frontier Plant Sciences 8: 1617.
Lichtenthaler, H.K.; Wellburn, A.R. 1983. Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochemical Society Transactions 11(5): 591-597.
Lin, W.; Lin, M.; Zhou, H.; et al. 2019. The effects of chemical and organic fertilizer usage on rhizosphere soil in tea orchards. PLoS ONE 14(5): e0217018.
Martínez, M.; Gutiérrez, V.; Novo, R. 2010. Microbiología aplicada al manejo sustentable de suelos y cultivos. Ed. Universidad Santa Maria, Chile. 235 pp.
Martínez M. 2015. Microbial bioproducts for agriculture. Acta Horticulturae 1076(1076): 71-76
Martínez, M.; Martínez, A. 2007. Effects of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria during the rooting period of sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum), Venezuela 51–71 variety, on the grower’s oasis substrate. In: Velázquez E., Rodríguez-Barrueco C. (eds) First International Meeting on Microbial Phosphate Solubilization. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, vol 102. Springer, Dordrecht.
McLaughlin, D.; Kinzelbach, W.2015. Food security and sustainable resource management. Water Resourse Research 51: 4966-4985.
Mulvaney, R.L. 1996. Nitrogen: Inorganic Forms. 1123–1184 p. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3, Chemical Methods. Sparks, D.L.; Page, A.L.; Helmke, P.A.
Ortega, R.; Fernandez, M. 2007. Agronomic evaluation of liquid humus derived from earthworm humic substances. Journal of Plant Nutrition 30(12): 2091-2104.
Ortega, R. 2015. Integrated nutrient management in conventional intensive horticulture production systems. Acta Horticulturae 1076: 159-164.
Ortega-Blu, R.; Martínez-Salgado, M.M.; Ospina, P.; et al. 2020. Nitrate Concentration in Leafy Vegetables from the Central Zone of Chile: Sources and Environmental Factors. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr (In press).
Poblete, H.; Martínez, M.; Ortega, R. 2013. Integrated plant nutrition on the recovery of a pear (Pyrus communis 'Packam'S Triumph') orchard. Acta Horticulturae 1076: 179-186.
Pylak, M.; Oszust, K.; Frac, M. 2019. Review report on the role of bioproducts, biopreparations, biostimulants and microbial inoculants in organic production of fruit. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 18(3): 597-616.
Sadzawka, A.; Carrasco, M.; Grez, R.; et al. 2006. Recommended analysis methods for Chile soils Review 2006. Series INIA records N º34. Institute of Agricultural Research. Chile. 164 pp.
Sadzawka, A.; Carrasco, M.; Demanet, R.; et al. 2007. Methods of analysis of plant tissues. Series INIA records No. 40. Institute of Agricultural Research. Santiago. Chile. 120 pp.
Tabatatai, M.; Bremmer, J. 1969. Use of p-nitrofenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 1(4): 301-307.
Wang, Z.H.; Li, S.X. 2019. Chapter Three - Nitrate N loss by leaching and surface runoff in agricultural land: A global issue (a review). Advances in Agronomy 156: 159-217.
Ye, L.; Zhao, X.; Bao, E.; et al. 2020. Bio-organic fertilizer with reduced rates of chemical fertilization improves soil fertility and enhances tomato yield and quality. Scientific Reports 10: 177.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Los autores que publican en esta revista aceptan los siguientes términos:
a. Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y conceden a la revista el derecho publicación, simultáneamente licenciada bajo una licencia de Creative Commons que permite a otros compartir el trabajo, pero citando la publicación inicial en esta revista.
b. Los autores pueden celebrar acuerdos contractuales adicionales separados para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión publicada de la obra de la revista (por ejemplo, publicarla en un repositorio institucional o publicarla en un libro), pero citando la publicación inicial en esta revista.
c. Se permite y anima a los autores a publicar su trabajo en línea (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su sitio web) antes y durante el proceso de presentación, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos, así como una mayor citación del trabajo publicado (ver efecto del acceso abierto).