Aerogenerador instalado en edificio multifamiliar: ¿Rentable o no? ¿Sostenible o no?

Autores

  • Guillermo Linares Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo
  • Raúl Siche Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2016.01.05

Palavras-chave:

Análisis económico, emergía, aerogenerador, energía eólica

Resumo

El propósito de este estudio fue determinar la sustentabilidad económica y ambiental de un aerogenerador horizontal prototipo instalado en un edificio multifamiliar. La sustentabilidad económica se determinó por estudio económico clásico primario y la sustentabilidad ambiental utilizando el enfoque emergético. El análisis económico clásico indica que el proyecto no es rentable (VAN = -2971,05 dólares americanos) y el análisis ambiental (porcentaje de renovabilidad: 0,18; tasa de rendimiento de emergía: 1,23); tasa de carga ambiental: 4,48; índice de sustentabilidad energética: 0,275; relación de inversión energética: 4,35 y tasa de intercambio emergético: 0,32) indica una elevada dependencia del sistema respecto a maquinarias importadas, eficiencia media respecto al aprovechamiento de recursos locales en beneficio de la sociedad, bajo impacto ambiental y un costo de producción medio respecto a otros procesos de producción de electricidad.

Referências

Agostinho, F.; Diniz, G.; Siche, R.; Ortega, E. 2008. The use of emergy assessment and the Geographical Information System in the diagnosis of small family farms in Brazil. Ecological Modelling 210 (1): 37-57.

Brown, M. 1997. Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation. Ecological Engineering 9 (1): 51-69.

Brown, M.; Ugliati, S. 2002. Emergy evaluations and environmental loading of electricity production systems. Journal of cleaner production 10 (4): 321-334.

Brown, M.; Raugei, M.; Ugliati, S. 2012. Boundaries and investments in Emergy Synthesis and LCA: A case of study on Thermal vs photovoltaic electricity. Ecological Indicators 15 (1): 227-235.

Buonocore, E.; Vanoli, L.; Carotenuto, A.; Ulgiati, S. 2015. Integrating life cycle assessment and emergy synthesis for the evaluation of a dry steam geothermal power plant in Italy. Energy 86: 476-487.

Cao, K.; Feng, X. 2007. The Emergy Analysis of multi-product systems. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 85 (5): 494-500.

Caruso, C.; Catenassi, G.; Marchettini, N.; Principi, L.; Tiezzi, E. 2001. Emergy based analysis of italian electricity production system. Journal of thermal analysis and Calorimetry 66 (1): 265-272.

Castellini, C.; Bastianoni, S.; Bosco, A.; Brunetti, M. 2006. Sustainability of poultry production using emergy approach: Comparison of conventional and organic rearing systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Envionment 114: 343-350.

Cavalett, O.; Ortega, E. 2010. Integrated environmental Assesment of biodiesel production from soybean in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (1): 55-70.

Chen, Z.X. 2010. Emergy based ecological assessment of constructed wetland for municipal wastewater treatment: methodology and application to the Beijing wetland. J of Environmental informatics 15 (2): 62-73.

Ciotola, R.; Lansing, S.; Martin, J. 2011. Emergy analysis of biogas production and electricity generation from small-scale agricultural digesters. Ecological engineering 37: 1681-1691.

Cohen, M.; Brown, M.; Shepherd, K. 2006. Estimating the environmental costs of soil erosion at multiple scales in Kenya using emergy synthesis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 114: 249-269.

Dincer, I. 2000. Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 4 (2): 157-175.

Dong, X.; Ugliati, S.; Yang, M.; Zhang, X.; Gao, W. 2008. Energy and Emergy evaluation of bioethanol production from wheat in Henan province, China. Energy Policy 36 (10): 3882-3892.

Engardio, P. 2007. Beyond the Green Coorporation. Bussiness Week January 29: 50-64.

Florida, R.; Davison, D. 2001. Gaining from green manegement:environmental manegement systems inside and outside the factory. California Management Review 43 (3): 64-84.

Goh, C.; Lee, K. 2010. Palm-based biofuel refinery (PBR) to substitute petroleum refinery: an energy and emergy assessment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy reviews 14: 2986-2995.

Iribarren, D.; Vasquez-Rowe, I.; Benedetto Rugani, E. 2014. On the feasibility of using emergy analysis as a source of benchmarking criteria through data envelopment analysis: A case study for wind energy. Energy 67: 527-537.

Jorgensen, S. 2004. Emergy and exergy stored in genetic information. Ecological modelling 178 (1-2): 11-16.

Liu, S.; Sun, D.; Wan, S. 2007. Emergy evaluation of a kind of Biodiesel production system and construction of new emergy indices. Natural Science 86 (1-2): 256-263.

MeiMei, Z.; Zhifeng, W.; Chao, X.; Hui, J. 2012. Embodied Energy and emergy analyses of a concentrating solar power system. Energy Policy 42: 232-238.

Mingyue, P.; Lixiao, Z.; Ulgiati, S.; Changbo, W. 2015. Ecological Impacts of small hydropower in China: Insights from an emergy analysis of a case plant. Energy Policy 76: 112-122.

Mosquera, P. 2010. Energías Renovables para todos. Editorial Haya Comunicación. Madrid – España.

Muñante, D. 1995. Indicadores de la evaluación económica de proyectos: VAN, B/C, N/K, TIR. Definición de cálculo e interpretación. Editorial Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo. Chapingo - Mexico.

Odum, H. 1983. System ecology. Editorial Wiley. New York - USA.

Odum, H. 1988b. Self organization, transformity and information. Science 242: 1132-1139.

Odum, H. 1996. Environmental accounting. Emergy and environmental decision-making. Editorial Wiley. New York - USA.

Ortega, E.; Anami, M. 2002. Certification of food products using emergy analysis. Proceedings of III International workshop Advances in Energy Studies. 227-237.

Ouammi, A.; Sacile, R.; Zejli, D.; Mimet-Abdelaziz, B. 2010. Sustainability of a wind power plant: Aplication to different Moroccan sites. Energy 35: 4226-4236.

Paoli, C. V. 2008. Solar power: an approach to transformity evaluation. Ecological Engineering 34: 191-206.

Pereira, C.; Ortega, E. 2010. Sustainability assessment of large-scale ethanol production from sugarcane. Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (1): 77-82.

Rydberg, T.; Haden, A. 2006. Emergy evaluations of Denmark and Danish agriculture: Assessing the influence of changing resource availability on the organization of agriculture and society. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 117 (2): 145-158.

Sapag, N.; Sapag, R. 1991. Preparación y evaluación de Proyectos Sapag. Editorial McGraw-Hill. México.

SENAMHI. 2012. Servicio Nacional de Metereología e Hidrología del Perú. Disponible en: http://www.senamhi.gob.pe/main_mapa.php?t=dHi

Sha, S.; Markku, H. 2012. Emergy evaluation of combined heat and power plant processes. Applied Thermal Engineering 43: 67-74.

Siche, R.; Ortega, E. 2005a. Cálculo do indice de reno-vabilidade emergética na avalição da sustentabilidade de uma economia nacional. Agrener 6 (1), 1-7.

Siche, R.; Ortega, E. 2005b. Índice de Sustentabilidade Emergético como ferramenta para avaliar a sustentabilidade dos países da América Latina. Seminário Internacional Ciencia e Tecnologia na América Latina 2. UNICAMP. Brasil.

Siche, R.; Ortega, E. 2007. Emergy-based sustainability of the Peruvian Economy. En M. Brown, Emergy Synthesis 4: Theory and applications of the Emergy Methodology (págs. 11.1-11.12). Gainesville, Florida: The Center for Environmental Policy.

Siche, R. 2007. Avaliação ecológica-termodinâmica e econômica de nações: o peru como estudo de caso. Tesis de Doctorado, Universidad Estadual de Campinas. Brasil.

Siche, R.; Agostinho, F.; Ortega, E.; Romeiro, A. 2008. Sustainability of nations by indices: Comparative study between environmental sustainability index, ecological footprint and the emergy performance indices. Ecological Economics 66: 628 – 637.

Siche, R.; Agostinho, F. 2015. El Índice de Beneficio Emergético (IBE) como indicador de sostenibilidad de las exportaciones del sector agropecuario de un país. Journal Agriculture and Animal Sciences 4 (2): 8-18.

Ugliati, S. 1998. Monitoring patterns of sustainability in natural and man-made ecosystems. Ecological Modelling 108 (1): 23-36.

Villarrubia, M. 2013. Ingeniería de la energía Eólica. Editorial Alfaomega. México D.F. - México.

Welch, J. 2009. The dual sustainability of wind power. sustainable Energy Reviews 13 (5): 1121-1126.

Xiaolong, W.; Yuanquan, C.; Peng, S.; Wangsheng Gao, F. 2014. Efficiency and Sustainability analysis of biogas and electricity production from a large-scale biogas project in China: an emergy evaluation based on LCA. Journal of Cleaner Production 65: 234-245.

Yang, Q. 2013. Environmental sustainability of wind power: An emergy analysis of a chinese wind farm. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Rev. 25: 229-239.

Zhang, L.; Yang, Z.; Chen, G. 2007. Emergy analysis of cropping-grazing system in Inner Mongolia Autono-mous Region, China. Energy Policy 35: 3843-3855.

Zhang, X.; Deng, S.; Wu, J.; Jiang, W. 2010. A sustainability analysis of a municipal sewage treatment ecosystem based on emergy. Ecological Engineering 36 (5): 685-696.

Zhou, J. 2008. Embodied ecological elements accounting of national economy. PhD. Dissertation. Peking University. Beijing - China.

Zhou, J. 2009. Emergy evaluations for constructed wetland and conventional wastewater treatments. Communi-cations in nonlinear science and numerical simulation 14 (4): 1781-1789.

Zhou, S.; Zhang, B.; Cai, Z. 2010. Emergy analysis of a farm biogas project in China: A biophysical perspective of agricultural ecological engineering. Communications in nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 15 (5): 1408-1418.

Received October 29, 2015.

Accepted March 18, 2016.

*Corresponding author

E-mail: rsiche@unitru.edu.pe (R. Siche).

Publicado

2016-04-15

Como Citar

Linares, G., & Siche, R. (2016). Aerogenerador instalado en edificio multifamiliar: ¿Rentable o no? ¿Sostenible o no?. Scientia Agropecuaria, 7(1), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2016.01.05

Edição

Seção

Artículos originales