Emotions and visual preferences of consumers towards native and classic potato (Solanum tuberosum) chips: Comparative study using neurogastronomy and neuromarketing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2023.021Keywords:
native potato, strategic decision making, market research, preferences and emotions, neuromarketingAbstract
The use of technological tools, in addition to traditional techniques, to understand consumer emotions and preferences for food products is very important so that product developers have better information for decision-making. This study aimed to use neurogastronomy and neuromarketing tools to study consumers' emotions and visual preferences toward native and classic potato flakes (Solanum tuberosum). Two types of fried flakes were used, classic potato and native potato, with a cost of S/ 6.60 (1.79 USD) and S/ 7.00 (1.90 USD), respectively. Eye Tracking technology and Emotion Analysis were used in the first stage using a mobile phone application. In the second stage, each participant answered a cognitive survey, using the Google form. A hundred consumers aged between 14 and 63 years were used. The survey showed that 45% of consumers indicated their intention to buy the native product rather than the classic product. The neuromarketing results mainly showed a higher proportion of neutrality, and a little lower, in negative emotions of "skepticism", "sadness" and "disgust", especially on the nutritional factor and price. These results, more than contradictory, are complementary since technological tools allow us to know more details about preferences and choices. Consumers intend to consume more native products, if they are more nutritious, more sustainable, cheaper, and benefit the local producer.
References
Antonetti, P. & Maklan, S. (2014). Feelings that make a difference: How guilt and pride convince consumers of the effectiveness of sustainable consumption choices. J. Bus. Ethics, 124, 117–134.
Aprile, M. C., Caputo, V., & Nayga Jr, R. M. (2016). Consumers’ preferences and attitudes toward local food products. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 22(1), 19–42.
Ariffin, S. K., Lee, T. M., & Mohsin, A. M. (2022). The Effects of Malaysian Consumer’s Emotions on Attitude Towards Mobile Advertising of Cosmetic Products. Malaysian Journal of Consumer and Family Economics, 28, 378 - 404.
Boggiano, M. M. (2016). Palatable Eating Motives Scale in a college population: Distribution of scores and scores associated with greater BMI and binge eating. Eating Behaviors, 21, 95–98.
Boggiano, M. M., Wenger, L. E., Burgess, E. E., Tatum, M. M., Sylvester, M. D., Morgan, P. R., & Morse, K. E. (2017). Eating tasty foods to cope, enhance reward, socialize or conform: What other psychological characteristics describe each of these motives? Journal of Health Psychology, 22(3), 280–289.
Bryła, P. (2016). Organic food consumption in Poland: Motives and barriers. Appetite, 105, 737–746. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.012
Brush, S., Kesseli, R., Ortega, R., Cisneros, P., Zimmerer, K., & Quiros, C. (1995). Potato diversity in the Andean center of crop domestication. Conservation Biology, 9(5), 1189–1198.
Cardello, A. V., Meiselman, H. L., Schutz, H. G., Craig, C., Given, Z., et al. (2012). Measuring emotional responses to foods and food names using questionnaires. Food Quality and Preference, 24, 243-250.
Chougule, B. B., & Patil, A. S.(2022). A Machine Learning Approach for Multiclass Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Data: A Review. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1591, 408-416. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07012-9_35
Cummings, J. R., Schiestl, E. T., Tomiyama, A. J., Mamtora, T., & Gearhardt, A. N. (2022). Highly processed food intake and immediate and future emotions in everyday life. Appetite, 169, 105868. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105868
Dalenberg, J. R., Gutjar, S., Ter Horst, G. J., de Graaf, K., Renken, R. J., et al. (2014). Evoked emotions predict food choice. PLoS One, 9, e115388. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115388
Das, S., Chatterjee, A., & Pal, T. K. (2020). Organic farming in India: a vision towards a healthy nation. Food Quality and Safety, 4(2), 69–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/fqsafe/fyaa018
Desmet, P. (2003). Development and application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products. In Funology; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Pp. 111–123.
Desmet, P. M. A., & Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2008). Sources of positive and negative emotions in food experience. Appetite, 50(2–3), 290-301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.08.003.
Devaux, A., Hareau, G., Ordinola, M., Andrade-Piedra, J., & Thiele, G. (2020). Native Potatoes. Choices, 35(4), 1–7.
Di Flumeri, G., Aricò, P., Borghini, G., Sciaraffa, N., Di Florio, A., & Babiloni, F. (2019). The dry revolution: Evaluation of three different EEG dry electrode types in terms of signal spectral features, mental states classification and usability. Sensors, 19(6), 1365.
Espichán, F., Rojas, R., Quispe, F., Cabanac, G., & Marti, G. (2022). Metabolomic characterization of 5 native Peruvian chili peppers (Capsicum spp.) as a tool for species discrimination. Food Chemistry, 386, 132704. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132704
Feldmann, C., & Hamm, U. (2015). Consumers’ perceptions and preferences for local food: A review. Food Quality and Preference, 40, 152–164.
Fernández-Ferrín, P., Calvo-Turrientes, A., Bande, B., Artaraz-Miñón, M., & Galán-Ladero, M. M. (2018). The valuation and purchase of food products that combine local, regional and traditional features: The influence of consumer ethnocentrism. Food Quality and Preference, 64, 138–147.
García-Madariaga, J., Blasco López, M. -F., Moya Burgos, I., & Recuero, N. (2019). Do isolated packaging variables influence consumers' attention and preferences? Physiology & Behavior, 200, 96-103. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.04.030.
Gottschalk, I., & Tabea, L. (2013). Consumer reactions to the availability of organic food in discount supermarkets. Int. J. Consum. Stud., 7, 136–142. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2012.01101.x
Gowri, S., Surendran, R., Divya Bharati, M. C., Jabes, J. (2022). Improved Sentimental Analysis to the Movie Reviews using Naive Bayes Classifier. 2022 through 18 March 2022. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronics and Renewable Systems, ICEARS 2022, 1831 - 1836. Code 178760. doi: 10.1109/ICEARS53579.2022.9752408
Hempel, C., & Hamm, U. (2016). How important is local food to organic-minded consumers? Appetite, 96, 309–318. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.036
Hernández-Fernández, A., Mora, E., & Vizcaíno, M. I. (2019). When a new technological product launching fails: A multi-method approach of facial recognition and E-WOM sentiment analysis. Physiology & Behavior, 200, 130-138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.04.023.
Horton, D., & Samanamud, K. (2013). Peru’s native potato revolution. Lima (Peru). International Potato Center (CIP). 6 p. Papa Andina Innovation Brief. no.2.
Ismael, D., & Ploeger, A. (2020). Consumers’ Emotion Attitudes towards Organic and Conventional Food: A Comparison Study of Emotional Profiling and Self-Reported Method. In Foods (Vol. 9, Issue 1). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9010079
Kröger, J. L., Lutz, O. H. M., & Müller, F. (2020). What Does Your Gaze Reveal About You? On the Privacy Implications of Eye Tracking. In: Friedewald, M., Önen, M., Lievens, E., Krenn, S., Fricker, S. (eds) Privacy and Identity Management. Data for Better Living: AI and Privacy. Privacy and Identity 2019. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 576. Springer, Cham. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42504-3_15
Meinzen-Dick, R. S., Devaux, A., & Antezana, I. (2009). Underground assets: potato biodiversity to improve the livelihoods of the poor. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 7(4), 235–248.
Meiselman, H. L. (2015). A review of the current state of emotion research in product development. Food Research International, 76(Part 2), 192-199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.04.015
Michel, C., Velasco, C., Gatti, E., & Spence, C. (2014). A taste of Kandinsky: Assessing the influence of the visual presentation of food on the diner’s expectations and experiences. Flavour, 3, 7.
Nestel, P. J., & Mori, T. A. (2022). Dietary patterns, dietary nutrients and cardiovascular disease. Rev. Cardiovasc. Med., 23(1), 17. doi: https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2301017
Paakki, M., Kantola, M., Junkkari, T., Arjanne, L., Luomala, H., & Hopia, A. (2022). “Unhealthy = Tasty”: How Does It Affect Consumers’ (Un)Healthy Food Expectations? FoodsOpen Access, 11(19), 3139. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11193139
Piñero, P., Pérez-Neira, D., Infante-Amate, J., Chas-Amil, M. L., & Doldán-García, X. R. (2020). Unequal raw material exchange between and within countries: Galicia (NW Spain) as a core-periphery economy. Ecological Economics, 172, 106621. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106621
Roascio-Albistur, A., & Gámbaro, A. (2018). Consumer perception of a non-traditional market on sous-vide dishes. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 11, 20–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2017.10.002
Salvador-Reyes, R., & Clerici, M. T. P. S. (2020). Peruvian Andean maize: General characteristics, nutritional properties, bioactive compounds, and culinary uses. Food Research International, 130, 108934. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108934
Samoggia, A., Del Prete, M., & Argenti, C. (2020). Functional needs, emotions, and perceptions of coffee consumers and non-consumers. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(14), 5694. doi: 10.3390/su12145694
Stasi, A., Songa, G., Mauri, M., Ciceri, A., Diotallevi, F., Nardone, G., & Russo, V. (2018). Neuromarketing empirical approaches and food choice: A systematic review. Food Res. Int., 108, 650–664.
Susac, A., Bubic, A., Planinic, M., Movre, M., & Palmovic, M. (2019). Role of diagrams in problem solving: An evaluation of eye-tracking parameters as a measure of visual attention. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15, 013101.
Tobin, D., Glenna, L., & Devaux, A. (2016). Pro-poor? Inclusion and exclusion in native potato value chains in the central highlands of Peru. Journal of Rural Studies, 46, 71–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.002
Tirado-Lara, R., Tirado-Malaver, R., Mayta-Huatuco, E., & Amoros-Briones, W. (2020). Identificación de clones de papa con pulpa pigmentada de alto rendimiento comercial y mejor calidad de fritura: Estabilidad y análisis multivariado de la interacción genotipo-ambiente. Scientia Agropecuaria, 11(3), 323-334. http://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2020.03.04
Tzafilkou, K., Panavou, R., & Economides, A. (2022). Facially Expressed Emotions and Hedonic Liking on Social Media Food Marketing Campaigns: Comparing Different Types of Products and Media Posts. 2022 17th International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization, SMAP, Virtual, online 3 al 4 November 2022, Cod.184277. doi: 10.1109/SMAP56125.2022.9942096
Wang, J., Bao, J., Wang, C., & Wu, L. (2017). The impact of different emotional appeals on the purchase intention for green products: The moderating effects of green involvement and Confucian cultures. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2017, 34, 32–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.001
Zheng, Q., Zeng, H., Xiu, X., Chen, Q. (2022). Pull the Emotional Trigger or the Rational String? A Multi-Group Analysis of Organic Food Consumption. Foods, 11(10), 1375. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11101375.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Scientia Agropecuaria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. The authors retain the copyright and assign to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published information whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the First publication in this journal.
b. Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work Was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of work Published (see The Effect of Open Access).