Biodiversity of ecotypes and aggressivenss ranges of Moniliophthora perniciosa, in Theobroma cacao L. national of the Ecuadorian Coast
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2021.064Keywords:
M. perniciosa, Theobroma cacao, basidiospores, basidiocarp, ecotypes, brooms axillaryAbstract
The objective of the work was focused on studying the biodiversity of ecotypes and aggressiveness ranges of Moniliophthora perniciosa, in Theobroma cacao. Plant material with the presence of the pathogen from 12 plantations of T. cacao L Nacional was sampled, analyzing its morphological characteristics, identification by PCR and the aggressiveness of the disease in national cacao EET-19. The basidiocarps differ in size and basidiospore production considering the strain MpLRBF-105 with the largest diameter of basidiocarp and basidiospore discharge. The basidiocarps differ in size and basidiospore production considering the strain MpLRBF-105 with the largest diameter of basidiocarp and basidiospore discharge. The content of lamelulas would be adding the increase of basidiospores in the strains (MpLRBF105 and MpBOLN107), with the largest dimensions between lengths of (11.58 to 12.01 µm) and width (6.23 and 5.95 µm) in the strains (MpLRBA-101, MpLRVE-102, MpLRMO-103, MpGUBA-104, MpLRBF-105 and MpBOLN-107). The genetic characterization of the ITS region of M. perniciosa showed genetic variability with the formation of three Sub-groups, this corresponds to their different agroecological zones of the Ecuadorian Coast. The highest degree of aggressiveness due to M. perniciosa infection gave rise to cotyledonal brooms with (4 to 11 axillary brooms) for the MpLRBF-105, MpGUBA-104, MpLRMO-103, and MpLRVE-102 strains. With 68% inhibition in fresh root weight, strain MpGUBA-104 (Balao). Consequently, the climatic conditions and the pressure to increase commercial plantations of T. cacao CCN-51, are generating changes in the ecology of M. pernciosa.
References
Aime, M., & Phillips, M. (2005). The causal agents of witches broom and frosty pod rot of cacao (Chocolate, Theobroma Cacao) form a New Lineage of Marasmiaceae. Mycologia, 97(5), 1012-22.
Allen, R., Bittner, P., Grenville, L., Meitz, J., Rehmany, A., Rose, L., & Beynon. J. (2004). Host-parasite coevolutionary conflict between Arabidopsis and Downy Mildew. Science, 306(5703), 1957-60.
Andebrhan, T. (1988). Rain water as a factor in the dissemination of basidiospores of Crinipellis Perniciosa (Stahel) Singer within cacao trees. In: Proc. 10th Int. Cocao Res. Conf. p 363.
Anzules, V., Borjas, R., Castro, V., & Julca. A. (2018). Caracterización de fincas productoras de cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) en Santo Domingo de Los Tsáchilas, Ecuador. Bosques Latitud Cero, 8(2), 39-50.
De Arruda, M., Ferreira, M., Miller, R., Resende, M., & Felipe. M. (2003). Nuclear and mitochondrial RDNA variability in Crinipellis Perniciosa from different geographic origins and hosts. Mycological Research, 107(1), 25-37.
Artero, A., Silva, J., Albuquerque, P., Bressan, E., Leal, G., Sebbenn, A., Griffith, G., & Figueira. A. (2017). Spatial genetic structure and dispersal of the cacao pathogen Moniliophthora perniciosa in the Brazilian Amazon. Plant Pathology, 66(6), 912-23.
Baker, R., & Crowdy. S. (1944). Studies in the witches’ broom disease of cacao caused by Marasmius perniciosus Stahel. Part II. Field Studies and Control Methods. Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad, No 7. 28 pp.
Baker, R., & Holliday. P. (1956). Witches’ broom disease of cacao (Marasmius perniciosus Stahel). Commonwealth Mycological Institute. Phytopathological No.2, 42 pp.
Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution International journal of organic evolution, 39(4), 783-91.
Fischer, M., & N. Money. (2010). Why mushrooms form gills: Efficiency of the lamellate morphology. Fungal Biology, 114(1), 57-63.
Garces, C. (1946). La escoba de bruja del Cacao. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomia, 6(24), 339-69.
González, R., & Rojas. A. (2014). La relevancia evolutiva de los ecotipos. Elementos, 21(95), 49-54.
Gramacho, K., Newman, L., Da Silva, F., Lopes, V., Pires, J., & Pereira. L. (2016). Pathogenic variability of Moniliophthora perniciosa in three agroecological zones of the cacao region of Bahia, Brazil.” Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 16(1), 7-13.
Gramacho, K., Risterucci, A., Lanaud, C., Lima, L., & Lopes. U. (2007). Characterization of microsatellites in the fungal plant pathogen Crinipellis perniciosa.” Molecular Ecology Notes, 7(1), 153-55.
Griffith, G., & Hedger. J. (1994a). Spatial distribution of mycelia of the Liana (L‐) biotype of the agaric Crinipellis perniciosa (Stahel) Singer in Tropical Forest.” New Phytologist, 127(2), 243-59.
Griffith, G., & Hedger. J. (1994b). The breeding biology of biotypes of the witches’ broom pathogen of cocoa, Crinipellis perniciosa. Heredity, 72(3), 278-89.
Griffith, G., Nicholson, J., Nenninger, A., Birch, R., & Hedger. J. (2003). Witches’ brooms and frosty pods: two major pathogens of cacao.” New Zealand Journal of Botany, 41(3), 423-35.
Guest, D. (2006). Black Pod: Diverse pathogens with a global impact on cocoa yield. The American Phytopathological Society 2(1):1650-53.
Holliday, P. (1995). Fungus Diseases of Tropical Crops. Dover Publications; Cambridge University Press. 624. pp
Kauserud, H., Colman, J., & Ryvarden. L. (2008). Relationship between basidiospore size, shape and life history characteristics: a comparison of polypores. Fungal Ecology, 1(1), 19-23.
Lana, T., Azevedo, J., Pomella, A., Monteiro, R., Silva, C., & Araújo. W. (2011). Endophytic and pathogenic isolates of the cacao fungal pathogen Moniliophthora perniciosa (Tricholomataceae) are indistinguishable based on genetic and physiological analysis. Genetics and Molecular Research : GMR, 10(1), 326-34.
Lisboa, D., Evans, H., Araújo, V., Elias, S., & Barreto. R. (2020). Moniliophthora perniciosa, the mushroom causing witches’ broom disease of cacao: insights into its taxonomy, ecology and host range in Brazil.” Fungal Biology, 124(12), 983-1003.
Louws, F., Fulbright, D., Stephens, C., & De Bruijn. F. (1994). Specific genomic fingerprints of phytopathogenic Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas pathovars and strains generated with repetitive sequences and PCR. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 60(7), 2286-95.
Marelli, J., Maximova, S., Gramacho, K., Kang, V., & Guiltinan. M. (2009). Infection biology of Moniliophthora perniciosa on Theobroma cacao and Alternate solanaceous Hosts. Tropical Plant Biology, 2(3), 149-60.
Mares, J., Gramacho, K., Dos Santos, E., Santiago, V., Silva, E., Alvim, F., & Pirovani. C. (2016). Protein profile and protein interaction network of Moniliophthora perniciosa Basidiospores.” BMC Microbiology, 16(1), 1-13.
Maridueña, M., Freire, A., Espinoza, R., Villavicencio, M., Jimenez, M., & Cevallos. J. (2019). Genetic characterization of Moniliophthora perniciosa from Ecuador and in vitro sensitivity to compost tea.” European Journal of Plant Pathology, 154(4), 943-59.
Meinhardt, L., Bellato, C., Rincones, J., Azevedo, R., Cascardo, J., & Pereira. G. (2006). In vitro production of biotrophic-like cultures of Crinipellis perniciosa, the causal agent of witches’ broom disease of Theobroma cacao. Current Microbiology, 52(3), 191-96.
Neto, A., Corrêa, R., Monteiro, W., Luz, E., Gramacho, K., & Lopes. U. (2005). Caracterização de uma população de cacaueiro para mapeamento de genes de resistência à vassoura de bruxa e podridão parda. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 30 (4), 1-9.
Osorio, C., Orozco, C., Lopez, G., & Rivera. F. (2012). Variabilidad genética de Moniliophthora perniciosa (Stahel) en variedades de cacao (Theobroma cacao L.). Acta Agronomica, 61(2), 93-101.
Purdy, L., & Schmidt. R. (1996). Status of cacao witches’ broom: biology, epidemiology, and management. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 34(4), 1-22.
Rocha, H., & Wheeler. B. (1985). Factors influencing the production of basidiocarps and the deposition and germination of basidiospores of Crinipellis perniciosa, the causal fungus of witches’ broom on cocoa (Theobroma cacao). Plant Pathology, 34(3), 319-28.
Santos, F., Pires, J., Lopes, V., de Brito, L., dos Santos Filho, L., Lemos, L., & Gramacho. K. (2017). Mycelial growth, starch degradation ability and aggressiveness of Moniliophthora perniciosa isolates towards cacao. Tropical Plant Pathology, 42(1), 21-27.
Stahel, G. (1915). Marasmius Perniciosus. The Cause of the Krulloten-Disease of Cacao in Suriname. Bulletin Departement van Den Landbouw in Suriname. 33, 1-78.
Stearns, S. (1992). The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press, London XII. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 249 pp.
Tamura, K,, Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A., & Kumar. S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30(12), 2725-29.
Teixeira, P., Thomazella, D., & Pereira. G. (2015). Time for chocolate: current understanding and new perspectives on cacao witches’ broom disease research. PLoS Pathogens, 11(10), 1-8.
Wheeler, B., & Mepsted. R. (1988). Pathogenic variability amongst isolates of Crinipellis perniciosa from cocoa (Theobroma Cacao). Plant Pathology, 37(4), 475-88.
White, T., Bruns, T., Lee, S., & Taylor. J. (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal rna genes for phylogenetics. Academic Press. 315-322 pp.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Javier Andrés Auhing Arcos, Ángel Virgilio Cedeño Moreira, Silvia Saucedo Aguiar, Luis Fernando Vera Benites, Cristhian John Macías Holguín, Hayron Fabricio Canchignia Martínez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. The authors retain the copyright and assign to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published information whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the First publication in this journal.
b. Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work Was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of work Published (see The Effect of Open Access).