Quantification of carbon stock in aboveground biomass of Suchiche Park, Tarapoto, Peru

Authors

  • Joselyn Caballero Solier Universidad Peruana Unión, Facultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Escuela Profesional de Ingeniería Ambiental; Tarapoto, Perú. https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1544-8912
  • Jina Chávez Vásquez Universidad Peruana Unión, Facultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Escuela Profesional de Ingeniería Ambiental; Tarapoto, Perú. https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5938-1799
  • Ceila Lao Universidad Peruana Unión, Facultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Escuela Profesional de Ingeniería Ambiental; Tarapoto, Perú.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17268/agroind.sci.2026.01.03

Keywords:

Urban carbon capture, local climate mitigation, urban green infrastructure

Abstract

This study quantified the carbon stock in the aboveground biomass of Suchiche Park (Tarapoto, Peru), a 0.265 ha urban green space. Using systematic sampling across 8 circular plots (100 m² each), 88 trees (DBH ≥ 10 cm) from 10 species were evaluated through non-destructive methods and validated allometric equations for tropical forests. Results revealed Elaeis guineensis (African Oil Palm) as the most efficient species, storing 10.76 Mg C (65.19% of the total) despite comprising only 26% of individuals. Its superiority was attributed to large size (mean DBH: 51.71 cm; height: 13.35 m) and high wood density, capturing 0.47 Mg C/tree (17× more than the second-most efficient species). The native Tarapotus Palm, while the most abundant (25 individuals), showed lower individual capture (0.15 Mg C/tree), contributing 22.2% of total carbon. Species like Ficus benjamina (17 individuals) had low efficiency (0.03 Mg C/tree) due to frequent pruning and reduced height (4.51 m). Significant correlations were found between dasometric variables and carbon: DBH vs. carbon (r = 0.93) and height vs. carbon (r = 0.88), confirming that each additional cm of DBH increases ~0.02 Mg C/tree. The park stores 16.51 Mg C (equivalent to 60.57 Mg CO₂), with a density of 62.2 Mg C/ha, surpassing urban areas like Northern Lima but still below primary Amazonian forests.

References

Agbelade, A. D., & Onyekwelu, J. C. (2020). Tree species diversity, volume yield, biomass and carbon sequestration in urban forests in two Nigerian cities. Urban Ecosystems. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11252-020-00994-4

Aranda-Arguello, R., Coss, A. L., Arce-Espino, C., Pinto-Ruiz, R., Guevara-Hernández, F., & Raj-Aryal, D. (2018). Captura de carbono en la biomasa aérea de la palma de aceite en Chiapas, México. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 29(3), 629-637.

Baccini, A., Walker, W., Carvalho, L., Farina, M., Sulla-Menashe, D., & Houghton, R. A. (2017). Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss. Science, 358(6360), 230-234. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5962

Bastin, J. -F., Finegold, Y., Garcia, C., Mollicone, D., Rezende, M., Routh, D., Zohner, C. M., & Crowther, T. W. (2019). The global tree restoration potential. Science, 365(6448), 76-79. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0848

Cardoso, A. C. D., Miranda, T. B., Lima, J. J. F., & Brazil, E. T. A. (2022). Chapter 13 - Beyond formal urban policies: Resilient periurban alternative practices in the Amazon. En A. Colucci & G. Pesaro (Eds.), ECO systems of Resilience Practices (pp. 229-248). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819198-9.00018-1

Chave, J., Réjou-Méchain, M., Búrquez, A., Chidumayo, E., Colgan, M. S., Delitti, W. B. C., Duque, A., Eid, T., Fearnside, P. M., Goodman, R. C., Henry, M., Martínez-Yrízar, A., Mugasha, W. A., Muller-Landau, H. C., Mencuccini, M., Nelson, B. W., Ngomanda, A., Nogueira, E. M., Ortiz-Malavassi, E., … Vieilledent, G. (2014). Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Global Change Biology, 20(10), 3177-3190. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12629

Escobedo, F. J., Kroeger, T., & Wagner, J. E. (2011). Urban forests and pollution mitigation: Analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environmental Pollution, 159(8), 2078-2087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.010

Fonseca, W. (2017). Revisión de métodos para el monitoreo de biomasa y carbono vegetal en ecosistemas forestales tropicales. Revista de Ciencias Ambientales, 51(2), 91. https://doi.org/10.15359/rca.51-2.5

Gallardo, J., & Tasilla, F. (2020). Pérdida de cobertura vegetal en el distrito de Morales, San Martin, Perú (periodo 1987 – 2017). Revista de Investigación Ciencia, Tecnología y Desarrollo, 6. https://doi.org/10.17162/rictd.v6i1.1400

IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Working Group III contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/

Leite-Filho, A. T., Soares-Filho, B. S., Davis, J. L., Abrahão, G. M., & Börner, J. (2021). Deforestation reduces rainfall and agricultural revenues in the Brazilian Amazon. Nature Communications, 12(1), 2591. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22840-7

Lewis, K., Rumpang, E., Kho, L. K., McCalmont, J., Teh, Y. A., Gallego-Sala, A., & Hill, T. C. (2020). An assessment of oil palm plantation aboveground biomass stocks on tropical peat using destructive and non-destructive methods. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 2230. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58982-9

Moreno, R., Nery, A., Zamora, R., Lora, Á., & Galán, C. (2024). Contribution of urban trees to carbon sequestration and reduction of air pollutants in Lima, Peru. Ecosystem Services, 67, 101618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101618

Muñoz-Pacheco, C. B., & Villaseñor, N. R. (2022). Urban Ecosystem Services in South America: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(17), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710751

Nowak, D. J., Hirabayashi, S., Bodine, A., & Greenfield, E. (2014). Tree and forest effects on air quality and human health in the United States. Environmental Pollution, 193, 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.05.028

Publications—IPCC-TFI. (2022). https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol4.html

Reynolds, C. C., Escobedo, F. J., Clerici, N., & Zea-Camaño, J. (2017). Does “Greening” of Neotropical Cities Considerably Mitigate Carbon Dioxide Emissions? The Case of Medellin, Colombia. Sustainability, 9(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050785

Seddon, N., Smith, A., Smith, P., Key, I., Chausson, A., Girardin, C., House, J., Srivastava, S., & Turner, B. (2021). Getting the message right on nature-based solutions to climate change. Global Change Biology, 27(8), 1518-1546. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15513

Speak, A. F., & Salbitano, F. (2023). The impact of pruning and mortality on urban tree canopy volume. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 79, 127810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127810

Ugle Pimpalkhute, P., Rao, S., & Ramachandra, T. V. (2010). Carbon sequestration potential of urban trees in Pune, India. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(12), 2507–2515.

Published

2026-01-05

How to Cite

Caballero Solier, J., Chávez Vásquez, J., & Lao, C. (2026). Quantification of carbon stock in aboveground biomass of Suchiche Park, Tarapoto, Peru. Agroindustrial Science, 16(1), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.17268/agroind.sci.2026.01.03

Issue

Section

Artículos de investigación