Architecture for the localization of users in mixed reality applications

Authors

  • José Luis Peralta Luján Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Av. Juan Pablo II s/n – Ciudad Universitaria, Trujillo, Perú.

Keywords:

Mixed Reality, Architecture, ATAM

Abstract

Currently, thanks to Mixed Reality (MR), a wide range of new applications is being generated, which mix the real world that surrounds us with a virtual world generated by a computer. The main objective of this paradigm is to immerse the user in a new environment, which is the product of the aforementioned fusion, and which we call mixed reality environment (AmMR). To achieve this immersion it is vitally important to know the location of the user (s) (especially when you want to work on tasks that require collaboration between them), and there are still no studies where the location for more than one user is explored in these environments. , is that the present work has as objective the design of an architecture, for this ATAM (Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method) was used, which allowed the capture of the quality attribute scenarios and the evaluation of this; Likewise, it was verified that the scenarios were covered by the proposed architecture, obtaining a minimum location time of 0.10 seconds and a maximum of 0.33 seconds, generating alerts if necessary in less than one second.

References

Bass, L.; Clements, P.; Kazman, R. 2013. Software architecture in practice. 3ra Edición. Addison-Wesley. Massachuttes, United States. 589 pp.

Chalhoub, J.; Ayer, S. 2018. Using mixed reality for electrical construction design communication. Automation in Construction 86: 1-10.

Farshid, M.; Paschen, J.; Eriksson, T.; Kietzmann, J. 2018. Go boldly!: Explore augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and mixed reality (MR) for business. Business Horizons 61: 657-663.

Flavián, C.; Ibáñez, S.; Orús, C. 2019. The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience. Journal of Business Research 100: 547-560.

Incekara, F.; Smits, M.; Dirven, C.; Vincent, A. 2018. Clinical feasibility of a wearable mixed-reality device in neurosurgery. World Neurosurgery 118: 422-427.

Kazman, R.; Bass, L. 2005. Categorizing business goals for software architectures. Software Engineering Institute. Disponible en: https://resources.sei.cmu.edu/library/asset-view.cfm?assetid=7751.

Kazman, R.; Klein, M.; Clements, P. 2000. ATAM: Method for architecture evaluation. Software Engineering Institute. Disponible en: https://resources.sei.cmu.edu/library/asset-view.cfm?assetid=5177.

Ke, F.; Lee, S.; Xu, X. 2016. Teaching training in a mixed-reality integrated learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior 62: 212-220.

Nisi, V.; Dionisio, M.; Barreto, M.; Nunes, N. 2018. A mixed reality neighborhood tour: Understanding visitor experience and perceptions. Entertainment Computing 27: 89-100.

Ostanin, M.; Klimchik, A. 2018. Interactive robot programing using mixed reality. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51: 50-55.

Parveau, M.; Adda, M. 2018. 3iVClass: A new classification method for virtual, augmented and mixed realities. Procedia Computer Science 141: 263-270.

Tieto, V.; Turner, A. 2022. Experiencias compartidas en realidad mixta. Microsoft Docs. Disponible en: https://docs.microsoft.com/es-mx/windows/mixed-reality/shared-experiences-in-mixed-reality.

Turner, A.; Arya, H.; Tieto, V.; Coulter D. 2022. Coordinate systems. Microsoft Docs. Disponible en: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/mixed-reality/coordinate-systems.

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Peralta Luján , J. L. (2022). Architecture for the localization of users in mixed reality applications. Revista CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGÍA, 18(3), 57-64. Retrieved from https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/PGM/article/view/4804

Issue

Section

Artículos Originales