Etiology and intensity of leaf spot in wheat cultivars at three sites at Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2011.03.04Keywords:
Triticum aestivum, Bipolaris sorokiniana, Drechslera siccans, D. tritici-repentis, Stagonospora nodorum.Abstract
This study aimed to identify and quantify the causal agents of fungal leaf blights, and compare different assessment methods for disease quantification. The experiments were conducted with 20 medium cycle cultivars in Passo Fundo, Saint Augustus and Vacaria counties with three replications in randomized blocks. For evaluation 20 leaves were collected per plot, at flowering stage. Disease severity was estimated by the percent diseased leaf area and lesions number per leaf. For fungus etiology, twenty five discs of each leaf sample containing a lesion were subjected to a humid chamber. After three days incubation fungi identification was performed under a dissecting microscope. The mean incidence, number of lesions and severity data were subjected to analysis of variance and means compared by the Tukey’s multiple test at 5% significance level. The severity and lesions number were the most efficient criteria to fungal foliar disease, predominantly Bipolaris sorokiniana, Drechslera siccans, D. tritici-repentis and Stagonospora nodorum. The cultivars with the highest incidence rates were not the same as that presented the greatest number of injuries and severity. Join the appearance D. siccans and the resurgence of S. nodorum.
References
Barcellos, A.L. 1982. As ferrugens do trigo no Brasil. In: Fundação Cargill. Trigo no Brasil. Campinas, Brasil. Cap. 10, vol. 2, p. 345-419.
Balardin, R.S. 2001. Eficiência de metconazole, Stratego, PE 11200, Artea, Foliur 200 CE, Propiconazole + Tebuconazole 250 CE, Horizon, JAU 6476 250 CE no controle de mancha na folha na cultivar BR 16 de trigo (Triticum aestivum). XXXIII Reunião da Comissão Sul-Brasileira de Pesquisa do Trigo. Atas e Resumos. Passo Fundo, RS, Brasil. p. 118.
Berger, R.D.; Bergamin Filho, A.; Amorim, L. 1997. Lesion expansion as an epidemic component. Phytopathology 87: 1005-1013.
Casa, R.T.; Hoffmann, L.L.; Panisson, E.; Mendes, C.C.; Reis, E.M. 2002. Sensibilidade de Blumeria graminis f.sp. tritici a alguns fungicidas. Fitopatologia Brasileira 27: 626-630.
CSBPT - Comissão Sul - Brasileira de Pesquisa de Trigo. 2006. Indicações técnicas para a cultura do trigo. Passo Fundo, RS: Reunião da Comissão Sul-Brasileira de Pesquisa de Trigo e Triticale. EMBRAPA, Passo Fundo, RS, Brasil. 114 p.
Garcés, F.R.; Boller, W.; Durao, C.F.; Ferreira, M. C. 2010. Evaluación de fungicidas en el control de enfermedades de órganos aéreos en función de diferentes boquillas de pulverización en el cultivo de trigo. Tropical Plant Pathology 35(Suplemento): S89.
Garcés, F.R.; Deuner, E.; Nicolini, F.; Tonin, R.B.; Danelli, A.L.D. 2010. Efeito de fungicidas e pontas de pulverização no rendimento na cultura de trigo no Planalto médio do RS. Tropical Plant Pathology 35(Suplemento): S279.
Johnson, R.; Taylor, A.J. 1976. Spore yield of pathogens in investigations of the racespecificity of host resistance. Annual Review Phytopatology 14: 97-119.
Kuhnem, J. P. R.; Casa, R. T.; Rizzi, F. P.; Moreira, E. N.; Bogo, A. 2009. Desempenho de fungicidas no controle de doenças foliares em trigo. Ciências Agroveterinárias 8(1): 35-42.
Large, E.C. 1954. Growth stages in cereals. Plant Pathology 3: 128-129.
Luo,Y.; Zeng, S.M. 1995. Simulation studies on epidemics of wheat stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis) on slow-rusting cultivars and analysis of effects of resistance components. Plant Pathology 44: 340-349.
Mehta, Y.R. 1993. Manejo Integrado de Enfermedades del Trigo. Centro de Investigación Agrícola Tropical (CIAT), Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia. 314 p.
Nutter, F.W.; Teng, S.P.; Royer, M.M. 1993. Terms and concepts for yield, crop, and disease thresholds. Plant Disease 77: 211-215.
Prates, L.G.; Fernandes, J.M.C. 2001. Avaliando a taxa de expansão de lesões de Bipolaris sorokiniana em trigo. Fitopatologia Brasileira 26: 185-191.
Picinini, E.C.; Fernandes, J.M.C.; Ignaczack, J.C.; Ambrosi, I. 1996. Impacto econômico do uso do fungicida propiconazole na cultura do trigo (Triticum aestivum). Fitopatologia Brasileira 21: 362-368.
Rees, R.G.; Platz, G.J. 1983. Effects of yellow spot on wheat: comparison of epidemics at different stages of crop development. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 34: 39-46.
Reis, E.M.; Casa, R.T. 2005. Doenças do Trigo. In: Kimati, H.; Amorim, L; Rezende, J.A.M.; Bergamin Filho, A.; Camargo, L.E.A. Manual de Fitopatologia. Vol. 2, 4ta. Edição. p. 631-638.
Tonin, R.F.B.; Reis, E.M. 2009. Ocorrência de Dreschlera. spp. em folhas de trigo (Triticum aestivum) na safra 2008. In: III Reunião Brasileira de Pesquisa de Trigo e Triticale. Veranópolis, RS, Brasil. CD-ROM.
Tonin, R.B.; Reis, E.M.; Avozani, A.; Nicolini, F.; Garcés, F.R.; Danelli, A.L.D. 2010. Quantificação da incidência de Drechslera spp. em folhas de trigo (Triticum aestivum) na safra agrícola de 2009. Tropical Plant Pathology 35(Suplemento): S139.
* Autor para correspondencia.
E-mail: felipegarces23@yahoo.com (F. Garcés).
Recibido 16 septiembre 2011.
Aceptado 31 septiembre 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. The authors retain the copyright and assign to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published information whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the First publication in this journal.
b. Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work Was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of work Published (see The Effect of Open Access).