Caracterización del sistema de innovación sectorial agrícola global basado en análisis bibliométrico y análisis estructural
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17268/agroind.sci.2024.02.08Palabras clave:
Agriculture, innovation, system bibliometrics, analysis, tendencies, policiesResumen
Resulta difícil entender por qué en el Perú, una actividad productiva característica y en líneas generales tan exitosa a nivel macroeconómico como lo es la agricultura está subdividida en un subsector altamente productivo -agroexportador, que posiciona sus productos en los mercados más exigentes a nivel global- y una agricultura de familiar que mantiene a su actor principal, el agricultor tradicional, en un estado de subsistencia. Este último parece haberse estancado en el tiempo, conservando una matriz productiva centrada en cultivos transitorios de baja rentabilidad, sin acceso a tecnología o a asistencia técnica que le permita incrementar su competitividad, autonomía y poder de negociación, este fortalecimiento de capacidades les permitiría afrontar de una mejor manera las perturbaciones de mercado como la inflación postpandemia o la crisis de fertilizantes, dichas situaciones adversas no están delimitadas a una región o país por el contrario se encuentran generalizadas debido a la presión por la demanda mundial de alimentos por lo que es propicia la presente oportunidad para explorar cómo es que se aborda la temática de la innovación, el incremento de la productividad y la evolución del sector agrícola alrededor del mundo desde la perspectiva académica a través del análisis bibliométrico y el análisis estructural.
Citas
Abugattás, J., Barletti, B., Vilchez Astucuri, J., Béjar Díaz, M., Celiz Ignacio, E., Del Aguila Alfaro, A., Francisco Torres, M., Luis Nolazco Cama, J., Rondón Ramirez, G., & Vásquez, L. (2020). Agricultura de exportación: retos para la consolidación de clústeres productivos. Centro Nacional de Planeamiento Estratégico.
Akbari, M., Khodayari, M., Khaleghi, A., Danesh, M., & Padash, H. (2020). Technological innovation research in the last six decades: a bibliometric analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(5), 1806–1831. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2020-0166
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2017.08.007
Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/QSS_A_00019
Baccini, A., Barabesi, L., Khelfaoui, M., & Gingras, Y. (2020). Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals: An exploratory comparison of the networks of editors, authors and co-citations. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1162/QSS_A_00006
Bampa, F., O’Sullivan, L., Madena, K., Sandén, T., Spiegel, H., Henriksen, C. B., Ghaley, B. B., Jones, A., Staes, J., Sturel, S., Trajanov, A., Creamer, R. E., & Debeljak, M. (2019). Harvesting European knowledge on soil functions and land management using multi-criteria decision analysis. Soil Use and Management, 35(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/SUM.12506
Bank, W. (2012). Agricultural innovation systems: an investment source-book. Report Number 67207. Agricultural and rural development (ARD) case study Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
Barabási, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 311(3–4), 590–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00736-7
Borremans, L., Marchand, F., Visser, M., & Wauters, E. (2018). Nurturing agroforestry systems in Flanders: Analysis from an agricultural innovation systems perspective. Agricultural Systems, 162, 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGSY.2018.01.004
Brunori, G., Berti, G., Klerkx, L. W. A., Tisenkopfs, T., & Roep, D. (2011). Learning and innovation networks for sustainable agriculture: a conceptual framework. SolinSA.
Casas, J., Toja, J. J., Peñalver, P., Juan, M., León, D., Francisca, F. R., Gallego, I., Fenoy, E., Carmen, P. M., Sánchez, P., Bonachela, S., & Elorrieta, M. A. (2012). Farm ponds as potential complementary habitats to natural wetlands in a mediterranean region. Wetlands, 32(1), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13157-011-0265-5
Castañeda, C. P. (2019). El 75% de unidades productivas son informales. Informe Económico. Mayo 20, 2019 - La Cámara, 7-8.
Charatsari, C., Michailidis, A., Francescone, M., De Rosa, M., Aidonis, D., Bartoli, L., La Rocca, G., Camanzi, L., & Lioutas, E. D. (2023). Do Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems Have the Dynamic Capabilities to Guide the Digital Transition of Short Food Supply Chains? Information, 15(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/INFO15010022
Chen, M., Guo, Z., Dong, Y., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2021). Citations optimal growth path: A tool to analyze sensitivity to citations of h-like indexes. Journal of Informetrics, 15(4), 101215. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2021.101215
Defensoría del pueblo. (2021). Informe de Adjuntía N° 19-2021-DP/AMASPPI: En defensa de las personas expuestas a metales pesados, metaloides y otras sustancias químicas: Los impactos de la contaminación ambiental.
Demaine, J. (2022). Fractionalization of research impact reveals global trends in university collaboration. Scientometrics, 127(5), 2235–2247. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-021-04246-W
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.04.070
Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-006-0144-7
Elsevier. (2020). Scopus, Content Coverage Guide.
Fernández-Quijada, D. (2011). De los investigadores a las redes: una aproximación tipológica a la autoría en las revistas españolas de comunicación. In 1er Congreso Nacional de Metodología de la Investigación en Comunicación, Fuenlabrada (Spain), 14 April 2011.
Franceschet, M., & Costantini, A. (2010). The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 540–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2010.06.003
Fráquita Maquera, A. E. (2022). Blockchain, Innovation to the Value Chain and Improvement in the Management of Peruvian Family Farming. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, 391, 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06862-1_16
Freeman. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance. Lessons from Japan.
Friedrich, J., Bunker, I., Uthes, S., & Zscheischler, J. (2021). The Potential of Bioeconomic Innovations to Contribute to a Social-Ecological Transformation: A Case Study in the Livestock System. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/S10806-021-09866-Z
Gava, O., Favilli, E., Bartolini, F., & Brunori, G. (2017). Knowledge networks and their role in shaping the relations within the Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System in the agroenergy sector. The case of biogas in Tuscany (Italy). Journal of Rural Studies, 56, 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRURSTUD.2017.09.009
Giagnocavo, C., de Cara-García, M., González, M., Juan, M., Marín-Guirao, J. I., Mehrabi, S., Rodríguez, E., van der Blom, J., & Crisol-Martínez, E. (2022). Reconnecting Farmers with Nature through Agroecological Transitions: Interacting Niches and Experimentation and the Role of Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems. Agriculture, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/AGRICULTURE12020137
González Quintero, R., Gallego, I., Cazorla, M. J., Fuentes Rodríguez, F., Bonachela, S., & Casas, J. J. (2016). Efectos del tratamiento con sulfato de cobre (CuSO4) sobre la calidad del agua de balsas de riego. Producción + Limpia, 11(1), 42–52.
Guimarães, A. F., Malanski, P. D., Schiavi, S. M. D. A., & Bouroullec, M. D. M. (2022). Governance in agrifood global value chain: the scientific field in the recent 15 years. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 61(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2022.260595
Hekkert, M. P., & Negro, S. O. (2009). Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 584–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2008.04.013
Hermans, F. (2018). The potential contribution of transition theory to the analysis of bioclusters and their role in the transition to a bioeconomy. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 12(2), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1002/BBB.1861
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.0507655102
Hjørland, B. (2013). Citation analysis: A social and dynamic approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing & Management, 49(6), 1313–1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IPM.2013.07.001
Hutchins, B. I., Yuan, X., Anderson, J. M., & Santangelo, G. M. (2016). Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level. PLOS Biology, 14(9), e1002541. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.1002541
INDECI. (2019a). Informe de emergencia N° 685 - 12/08/2019: Contaminación por arsénico y plomo en el agua subterránea del distrito de Mórrope, Lambayeque.
INDECI, C. (2019b). Informe de emergencia No 997: Contaminación hídrica en el distrito de Pacora - Lambayeque.
INEI. (2019). Encuesta Nacional Agropecuaria (ENA) 2019.
INEI. (2021a). Perú: producto bruto interno según actividad económica (nivel 54), 2007-2021. Https://M.Inei.Gob.Pe/Estadisticas/Indice-Tematico/Economia/, Nivel 54, 7–8.
INEI. (2021b). Producción y Empleo Informal en el Perú, Cuenta Satélite de la Economía Informal 2007-2020.
Ingram, J. (2018). Agricultural transition: Niche and regime knowledge systems’ boundary dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIST.2017.05.001
ITP. (2020). Lambayeque: Economía, salud, educación, hogares, demografía, gobierno, industrias, I+D y red CITE. https://data-peru.itp.gob.pe/profile/geo/lambayeque
Jia, X. (2021). Agro-food innovation and sustainability transition: A conceptual synthesis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13126897
Klerkx, L., Van Mierlo, B., & Leeuwis, C. (2012). Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: Concepts, analysis and interventions. Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic, 457–483.
Klerkx, L., Aarts, N., & Leeuwis, C. (2010). Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems, 103(6), 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGSY.2010.03.012
Lamprinopoulou, C., Renwick, A., Klerkx, L., Hermans, F., & Roep, D. (2014). Application of an integrated systemic framework for analysing agricultural innovation systems and informing innovation policies: Comparing the Dutch and Scottish agrifood sectors. Agricultural Systems, 129, 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGSY.2014.05.001
Li, Y., Herzog, F., Levers, C., Mohr, F., Verburg, P. H., Bürgi, M., Dossche, R., & Williams, T. G. (2024). Agricultural technology as a driver of sustainable intensification: insights from the diffusion and focus of patents. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 44(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/S13593-024-00949-5
Liu, H., Skibniewski, M. J., Ju, Q., Li, J., & Jiang, H. (2020). BIM-enabled construction innovation through collaboration: a mixed-methods systematic review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(6), 1541–1560. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2020-0181
Liu, Z., Yin, Y., Liu, W., & Dunford, M. (2015). Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 103(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-014-1517-Y
Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
Mervin Obed, B. S. (2019). Estimación de los niveles de salinidad de los suelos de la cuenca del Río Chancay usando datos EVI y NDVI. http://repositorio.unprg.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12893/11155
Meynard, J. M., Jeuffroy, M. H., Le Bail, M., Lefèvre, A., Magrini, M. B., & Michon, C. (2017). Designing coupled innovations for the sustainability transition of agrifood systems. Agricultural Systems, 157, 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGSY.2016.08.002
MINAM. (2020). Oficio N° 00394-2020-MINAM/VMGA/DGCA.
MINCETUR. (2022). Exportaciones acumuladas por sector en el departamento de Lambayeque.
Ministerio de Desarrollo Agrario y Riego. (2019). Reporte Anual de Gases de Efecto Invernadero del sector Agricultura del año 2019.
Ministerio de Desarrollo Agrario y Riego. (2021). Atlas de la superficie agrícola del Perú. Repositorio Institucional - ANA. https://repositorio.ana.gob.pe/handle/20.500.12543/4895
Ministerio de Desarrollo Agrario y Riego. (2022). Agricultura familiar, características a nivel territorial del departamento de Lambayeque.
Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. Profesional de La Información, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.3145/EPI.2020.ENE.03
Nelson, R. R. (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1496195
OECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. In The Measurement of Scientific; Technological and Innovation Activities.
Padial, A. A., Nabout, J. C., Siqueira, T., Bini, L. M., & Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. (2010). Weak evidence for determinants of citation frequency in ecological articles. Scientometrics, 85(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-010-0231-7
Paredes Díaz, C., & Moreno Huaccha, K. (2019). Cooperativismo y su impacto en el rendimiento agropecuario local. Consorcio de Investigación Económica y Social (CIES). https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/handle/10757/626214
Patience, G. S., Patience, C. A., Blais, B., & Bertrand, F. (2017). Citation analysis of scientific categories. Heliyon, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2017.E00300
Pigford, A. A. E., Hickey, G. M., & Klerkx, L. (2018). Beyond agricultural innovation systems? Exploring an agricultural innovation ecosystems approach for niche design and development in sustainability transitions. Agricultural Systems, 164, 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGSY.2018.04.007
Plumecocq, G., Debril, T., Duru, M., Magrini, M. B., Sarthou, J. P., & Therond, O. (2018). The plurality of values in sustainable agriculture models: Diverse lock-in and coevolution patterns. Ecology and Society, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09881-230121
Poirrier, M., Moreno, S., & Huerta-Cánepa, G. (2021). Robust h-index. Scientometrics, 126(3), 1969–1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-020-03857-Z.
Qun, W., Ranran, C., Jingsuo, L., & Khan, N. (2024). Toward a sustainable agricultural system in China: exploring the nexus between agricultural science and technology innovation, agricultural resilience and fiscal policies supporting agriculture. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8, 1390014. https://doi.org/10.3389/FSUFS.2024.1390014
Ramos Guevara, K. E. (2021). Condiciones de salinidad y recuperación de los suelos salinos en un área representativa de la zona de Cayaltí, Zaña - Lambayeque. http://repositorio.lamolina.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12996/4896
Rijswijk, K., Klerkx, L., & Turner, J. A. (2019). Digitalisation in the New Zealand Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System: Initial understandings and emerging organisational responses to digital agriculture. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90–91, 100313. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NJAS.2019.100313
Santayana, S. (2015). Problemas de drenaje en la costa peruana. International Agricultural Centre (IAC), Wageningen. 116 p.
Scherbakova, N. G., & Bredikhin, S. V. (2021). Co-authorship network structure analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2099(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2099/1/012055
Sengupta, S., Choudhary, S., Obayi, R., & Nayak, R. (2024). Reducing food loss through sustainable business models and agricultural innovation systems. Supply Chain Management, 29(3), 540–572. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-01-2023-0059
Sigueñas, R., Ocola, L., & Guerrero, J. (2019). Vigilancia de la salinidad del suelo en cultivos de arroz en Lambayeque, periodo 2001-2014 utilizando imágenes de satélite y conductividad eléctrica. Revista de Investigación de Física, 22(2), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.15381/rif.v22i2.20290
Spielman, D. J., Birner, R., & Bank, T. W. (2008). How innovative is your agriculture?: Using innovation indicators and benchmarks to strengthen national agricultural innovation systems. Worldbank.
Sutherland, L. A., Peter, S., & Zagata, L. (2015). Conceptualising multi-regime interactions: The role of the agriculture sector in renewable energy transitions. Research Policy, 44(8), 1543–1554. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2015.05.013
Times higher education. (2023). Wageningen University & Research. World University Rankings. THE.
Touzard, J.-M., Temple, L., Faure, G., & Triomphe, B. (2015). Innovation systems and knowledge communities in the agriculture and agrifood sector: a literature review. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 17(2), 117–142. https://doi.org/10.3917/JIE.017.0117
Turner, J. A., Klerkx, L., Rijswijk, K., Williams, T., & Barnard, T. (2016). Systemic problems affecting co-innovation in the New Zealand Agricultural Innovation System: Identification of blocking mechanisms and underlying institutional logics. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 76, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NJAS.2015.12.001
Ulloa, M. A., Lujan, M. A., & Reyes, J. B. (2020). Potential role of sugar mills in the peruvian development. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 59, 1276–1283.
Velden, T. A., Haque, A., & Lagoze, C. J. (2009). A New Approach to Analyzing Patterns of Collaboration in Co-authorship Networks - Mesoscopic Analysis and Interpretation. Scientometrics, 85(1), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0224-6
Vermunt, D. A., Wojtynia, N., Hekkert, M. P., Van Dijk, J., Verburg, R., Verweij, P. A., Wassen, M., & Runhaar, H. (2022). Five mechanisms blocking the transition towards ‘nature-inclusive’ agriculture: A systemic analysis of Dutch dairy farming. Agricultural Systems, 195, 103280. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGSY.2021.103280
Wageningen University & Research. (2023a). About Wageningen University. Weningen University & Research. https://www.wur.nl/en/wageningen-university/about-wageningen-university.htm
Wageningen University & Research. (2023b). University Rankings. Wageningen University & Research. https://www.wur.nl/en/wageningen-university/rankings.htm
Wang, T., Ali, A. S., & Au-Yong, C. P. (2022). Exploring a body of knowledge for promoting the building information model for facility management. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASEJ.2022.101717
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Global Innovation Index 2022 What is the future of innovation-driven growth?
Wu, L., Hu, K., Lyulyov, O., Pimonenko, T., & Hamid, I. (2022). The Impact of Government Subsidies on Technological Innovation in Agribusiness: The Case for China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU142114003
Zhang, C., Fang, Y., Chen, X., & Congshan, T. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of trends in global sustainable livelihood research. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11041150
Zhao, Q., & Feng, X. (2022). Utilizing citation network structure to predict paper citation counts: A Deep learning approach. Journal of Informetrics, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2021.101235
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Los autores conservan sus derechos de autor sin restricciones.
