Nano-fertilizer prevents environmental pollution and improves physiological traits of wheat grown under drought stress conditions

Naimeh Astaneh; Foroud  Bazrafshan; Mahdi  Zare; Bahram  Amiri; Abdollah  Bahrani

doi:10.17268/sci.agropecu.2021.005

Autores

Naimeh Astaneh Department of Agriculture, Firouzabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Firouzabad
Foroud Bazrafshan Department of Agriculture, Firouzabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Firouzabad.
Mahdi Zare Department of Agriculture, Firouzabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Firouzabad.
Bahram Amiri Department of Agriculture, Firouzabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Firouzabad.
Abdollah Bahrani Department of Agriculture, Ramhormoz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ramhormoz.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2021.005

Palavras-chave:

nano fertilizers, nano-nitrogen, environmental pollution, drought stress, wheat, physiological traits, conventional fertilizer

Resumo

Nano fertilizers offer benefits in nutrition management through their strong potential to increase nutrient use efficiency. Traditional fertilizers are not only costly for the producer but may be harmful to humans and the environment. Furthermore, nano fertilizers may also be used for enhancing abiotic stress tolerance. This study was performed on the evaluation of nano chelated nitrogen and urea fertilizers on the physiological characteristics of wheat under drought stress conditions. Experiments were carried out in two locations in Fars province, Iran. The experimental design was performed as a split-split plot in RCBD design. The first factor included irrigation treatments (normal and withholding irrigation at the flowering stage), sub factor was nitrogen treatment (0, 37, 74 and 110 k g.ha^-1) in the form of Urea fertilizer, and sub-sub factor was nitrogen (0, 14, 27 and 41 kg.ha^-1) in the form of nano chelated nitrogen fertilizer. Studied traits were RWC, Ion Leakage, Protein, Phosphorus and Potassium content, Remobilization and photosynthesis rate. According to the analysis of variances, stress, nitrogen (urea) and nano chelated nitrogen had significant effects on all studied traits. Mean comparisons showed that drought stress led to 13% reduction in RWC, 21% Ion Leakage, 26% Protein, 13% Phosphorus and 26% Potassium content, 22% Remobilization and 69% photosynthesis rate compared to normal irrigation. In conclusion Application of 41 kg.ha^-1 nano chelated nitrogen fertilizer in comparison with urea led to increase 4% in Rwc, 3% Ion leakage, 52% protein, 26% phosphor, 6% potassium, 6% Remobilization and 21% photosynthesis rate compared to control, respectively.

Referências

Ata-Ul-Karim, S. T., Liu, X., Lu, Z., Yuan, Z., Zhu, Y., & Cao, W. (2016). In-season estimation of rice grain yield using critical nitrogen dilution curve. Field Crops Res. 195, 1-8.

Abid, M., Tian, Z., Ata-Ul-Karim, S.T., Cui, Y., Liu, Y., Zahoor, R., Jiang, D., & Dai, T. (2016). Nitrogen nutrition improves the potential of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to alleviate the effects of drought stress during vegetative growth periods. Frontiers in plant science, 7, 981.

Abdel-Motagally, F. M. F., & El-Zohri, M. (2018). Improvement of wheat yield grown under drought stress by boron foliar application at different growth stages. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 17, 178-185.

Ahmadian, K., Jalilian, J., & Pirzad, A. (2021). Nano-fertilizers improved drought tolerance in wheat under deficit irrigation, Agricultural Water Management, 244, 106544.

Ali, S., Rizwan, M., Hussain, A., Zia-ur-Rahman, M., Ali, B., Yousaf, B. Wijaia, L., & Ahmad, P. (2019). Silicon nanoparticles enhanced the growth and reduced the cadmium accumulation in grains of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem., 140, 1-8.

Al-jebory, E. I. (2012) Effect of water stress on carbohydrate metabolism during Pisum sativum seedlings growth. Euphrates J. Agric. Sci., 4, 1–12.

Arduini, I., Masoni, A., Ercoli, L., & Mariotti, M. (2006). Grain yield, and dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and remobilization in durum wheat as affected by variety and seeding rate. European Journal of Agronomy, 25(4), 309-318.

Assaha, D. V. M., Liu, L., Ueda, A., Nagaoka, T., & Saneoka, H. (2016). Effects of drought stress on growth, solute accumulation and membrane stability of leafy vegetable, huckleberry (Solanum scabrum Mill.). J. Environ. Biology, 37(1), 107.

Burhan, S. A., & AL-Hassan, M. G. (2019). Impact of nano npk fertilizers to correlation between productivity, quality and flag leaf of some bread wheat varieties, Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1029(50): 1-7.

Chapman, H. D.; & Pratt, D. F. (1961). Method of Analysis for Soil, Plant and Water. University of California, Agricultural Science, 60, 60-62.

Cox, C. M., Qualset, C. O., & Rains, D. W. (1986). Genetic variation for nitrogen assimilation and translocation in wheat. III. Nitrogen translocation in relation to grain yield and protein. Crop Sci., 737-740.

Ehdaie, B.G., Alloush, A., & Waines. J. G. (2008). Genotypic variation in linear rate of grain growth and contribution of stem reserves to grain yield in wheat. Field Crops Res., 106, 34-43.

El-Jaafari, S. (2000). Durum wheat breeding for abiotic stresses resistance: Defining physiological traits and criteria. Options Mediterranéennes, 40, 251-256.

Fan, S., Blake, TN., & Blumwald, E. (1994). Physiologia Plantarum, Wiley Online Library.

Farshadfar, E., Ghasempour, H., & Vaezi, H. (2008). Molecular aspects of drought tolerance in bread wheat (T. aestivum)., 11, 118-122.

Gurumurthy, S., Sarkar, B., Vanaja, M., Lakshmi, J., Yadav, S.K., & Maheswari, M. (2019). Morpho-physiological and biochemical changes in black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) genotypes under drought stress at flowering stage. Acta Physiol. Plant., 41, 42.

Iqbal, M.A. (2019). Nano-Fertilizers for Sustainable Crop Production under Changing Climate: A Global Perspective.

Kabiri, R., Nasibi, F., & Farahbakhsh, H. (2014). Effect of Exogenous Salicylic Acid on Some Physiological Parameters and Alleviation of Drought Stress in Nigella sativa Plant under Hydroponic Culture. Plant Prot., 50, 43-51.

Kacar, B., Katkat, B., & Öztürk, Ş. (2006). Plant Physiology. Nobel Press. 2.493-5334.

Kichey, T., Hirel, B., Heumez, E., Dubois, F., & Le Gouis, J. (2007). In winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), post-anthesis nitrogen uptake and remobilisation to the grain correlates with agronomic traits and nitrogen physiological markers. Field Crops Research, 102(1), 22-32.

Kjeldahl, J. (1883). A New Method for the Determination of Nitrogen in Organic Matter. Zeitschrift für Analytische Chemie, 22, 366-382.

Madani, A., Rad, A. S., Pazoki, A., & Nourmohammadi, G. (2010). Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain filling and dry matter partitioning responses to source:sink modifications under post anthesis water and nitrogen deficiency. Acta Sci. Agron. 32, 145-151.

Marci ´nska, I., Czyczyło-Mysza, I., Skrzypek, E., Filek, M.; Grzesiak, S., et al. (2013). Impact of osmotic stress on physiological and biochemical characteristics in drought-susceptible and drought-resistant wheat genotypes. Acta Physiol. Plant. 35, 451-461.

Mahajan, S., & Tuteja, N. (2005). Cold, salinity and drought stresses: an overview. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 444(2), 139-158.

Mobasser, H. R., Mohammadi, G. N., Heidari, H., Abad, S., & Rigi, K. (2014). Effect of application elements, drought stress and variety on nutrients of grain wheat in Zahak region, Iran. J. Biodivers. Environ. Sci., 5, 105-110.

Munns, R., Walace, P.A., Teakle, N.L., & Colmer, T.D. (2010). Measuring soluble ion concentrations (Na+, K+, Cl-) in salt-treated plants. Methods mol. Biol., 639, 371-382.

Nazarli, H., & Faraji, F. (2011). Response of proline, soluble sugars and antioxidant enzymes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to different irrigation regimes in greenhouse condition. Cercet. agronom. Moldova, 44, 27-33.

Noman, A., Ali, Q., Naseem, J., Javed, M.T., Kanwal, H., Islam, W., Aqeel, M., Khalid, N., Zafar, S., & Tayyeb, M. (2018). Sugar beet extract acts as a natural bio-stimulant for physio-biochemical attributes in water stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Acta Physiol. Plant., 40, 110.

Noaema, A., leiby, H., & Alhasany, A. (2020). Effect of Spraying Nano Fertilizers of Potassium and Boron on Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) The First International Conference of Pure and Engineering Sciences, ICPES2020) IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 871 012012 IOP Publishing.

Ozen, H. C., & Onay, A. (2007). Plant Physiology. ISBN 978-605-395-017-2, Nobel Press.

Papakosta, D., & Gagianas, A. A. (1991). Nitrogen and Dry Matter Accumulation, Remobilization, and Losses for Mediterranean Wheat during Grain Filling. Agronomy Journal, 83(5), 864-870.

Plaut, Z., Butow, B. J., Blumenthal, C. S., & Wrigley, C.W. (2004). Transport of dry matter into developing wheat kernels and its contribution to grain yield under post-anthesis water deficit and elevated temperature. Field Crops Research, 86, 185-198.

Rastogi, A., Tripathi, D.K., Yadav, S., Chauhan. Živčák, M., Ghorbanpour, M., et al. (2019). Application of silicon nanoparticles in agriculture. 3 Biotech 9, 1–11.

Saravia, D., Farfán-Vignolo, E. R., Gutiérrez, R., De Mendiburu, F., Schafleitner, et al. (2016). Yield and physiological response of potatoes indicate different strategies to cope with drought stress and nitrogen fertilization. American journal of potato research, 93(3), 288-295.

Sara, K., Abbaspour, H., Sinaki, J.M., & Makarian, H. (2012). Effects of Water Deficit and Chitosan Spraying on Osmotic Adjustment and Soluble Protein of Cultivars Castor Bean (Ricinus communis L.). J. Stress Physiol. Biochem., 8, 160-169.

Shangguan, Z.P., Shao, M.A., & Dyckmans, J. (2000). Nitrogen nutrition and water stress effects on leaf photosynthetic gas exchange and water use efficiency in winter wheat. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 44(2), 141-149.

Schonfeld M.A., Johnson R. C, Carver B. F., & Mornhinweg, D.W. (1988). Water relations in winter wheat as drought resistance indicators. Crop Sci., 28, 526-531.

Teixeira, F. A., Silva, F. F., da Bonomo, P., Pires, A. J. V, Nascimento, P. V. N. &. Neto, J. G. (2014). Performance of dairy heifers grazing Urochloa decumbens pastures deferred for two periods, Acta Sci., Anim. Sci., 36(1), 109-115.

Wang, L., Palta, J.A., Chen, W., & Deng, X. (2018). Nitrogen fertilization improved water-use efficiency of winter wheat through increasing water use during vegetative rather than grain filling. Agricultural Water Management, 197, 41-53.

Wu, F., Bao, W., Li, F. and Wu, N. (2008). Effects of drought stress and N supply on the growth, biomass partitioning and water-use efficiency of Sophora davidii seedlings. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 63(1-3), 248-255.

Zlatev, Z., & Lidon, F. C. (2012). An overview on drought induced changes in plant growth, water relations and photosynthesis. Emirates J. Food and Agri., 24(1), 57-72.

Valentovic, P. M., & Luxova, L. (2006). Effect of osmotic stress on compatible solutes content, membrane stability and water relations in two maize cultivars. Plant Soil Environ., 52(4), 186-191.

Yang, J., J., & Zang J. (2006). Grain filling of cereals under soil drying. New Phytol, 169, 223-236.