Vulnerabilidad de la quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) ante eventos de estrés ambiental en las regiones altoandinas del Perú

Kevin P.  Ccoyllar-Quintanilla; Ana F.  Zaravia-Povis; Arlitt A.  Lozano-Povis; José V.  Cornejo-Tueros

doi:10.17268/sci.agropecu.2021.063

Authors

Kevin P. Ccoyllar-Quintanilla Universidad Continental, Campus Huancayo S.A.C. Av. San Carlos 1980 - Urb. San Antonio, Huancayo, Junín https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7074-8047
Ana F. Zaravia-Povis Universidad Continental, Campus Huancayo S.A.C. Av. San Carlos 1980 - Urb. San Antonio, Huancayo, Junín https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8643-0391
Arlitt A. Lozano-Povis Universidad Continental, Campus Huancayo S.A.C. Av. San Carlos 1980 - Urb. San Antonio, Huancayo, Junín https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6748-4367
José V. Cornejo-Tueros Universidad Continental, Campus Huancayo S.A.C. Av. San Carlos 1980 - Urb. San Antonio, Huancayo, Junín https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8233-858X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2021.063

Keywords:

quinoa, yield, vulnerability, climate models, environmental stress

Abstract

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) is an agricultural crop that was domesticated in the Andes of Peru and Bolivia, and that has managed to be produced in any type of soil, characterized by its high amount of nutrients and because it is a species that comes to combat abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, among others. For example, in the face of drought and high temperatures, this crop becomes very tolerant as it has shown that it uses smaller amounts of water and adapts to fluctuations in the climate during biomass production, which makes it a great alternative for regions, arid and semi-arid. In this sense, the objective of this research article was to determine the vulnerability of the cultivation of quinoa to environmental stress events in the high Andean regions of Peru, through the development and analysis of the current distribution model and its future projections for 2050 and 2070 in scenarios RCP 2.6, RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 considering their points of presence and the different bioclimates. Likewise, determine by means of the BAM diagram the optimal zones for its development, considering the abiotic, biotic and accessibility variables. In conclusion, it was obtained that quinoa becomes very tolerant to abiotic stress events such as drought and high temperatures, highlighting as the most optimal areas for its development the departments of Puno, Apurímac, Ayacucho and Cuzco.

References

Ahmadi, S. H., Solgi, S., & Sepaskhah, A. R. (2019). Quinoa: A super or pseudo-super crop? Evidences from evapotranspiration, root growth, crop coefficients, and water productivity in a hot and semi-arid area under three planting densities. Agricultural Water Management, 225, 105784.

Alandia, G., Rodriguez, J. P., Jacobsen, S. E., Bazile, D., & Condori, B. (2020). Global expansion of quinoa and challenges for the Andean region. In Global Food Security (Vol. 26, p. 100429). Elsevier B.V.

Amador, E., & Montesinos, E. (2017). Adaptación del cultivo de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa willd) al cambio climático en los Andes del Perú. Revista Del Instituto de Investigación de La Facultad de Ingeniería Geológica, Minera, Metalurgica y Geográfica, 19(37), 15–23.

Anand, V., Oinam, B., & Singh, I. H. (2021). Predicting the current and future potential spatial distribution of endangered Rucervus eldii eldii (Sangai) using MaxEnt model. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2021 193:3, 193(3), 1–17.

Bedoya-Perales, N. S., Pumi, G., Talamini, E., & Padula, A. D. (2018). The quinoa boom in Peru: Will land competition threaten sustainability in one of the cradles of agriculture? Land Use Policy, 79, 475–480.

Boral, D., & Moktan, S. (2021). Predictive distribution modeling of Swertia bimaculata in Darjeeling-Sikkim Eastern Himalaya using MaxEnt: current and future scenarios. Ecological Processes 2021 10:1, 10(1), 1–16.

Borrell, J. S., Dodsworth, S., Forest, F., Pérez-Escobar, O. A., Lee, M. A., et al. (2020). The climatic challenge: Which plants will people use in the next century? Environmental and Experimental Botany, 170, 103872.

Bosso, L., Di Febbraro, M., Cristinzio, G., Zoina, A., & Russo, D. (2016). Shedding light on the effects of climate change on the potential distribution of Xylella fastidiosa in the Mediterranean basin. Biological Invasions 2016 18:6, 18(6), 1759–1768.

Cruces, L., de la Peña, E., & De Clercq, P. (2020). Insect diversity associated with quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in three altitudinal production zones of Peru. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 40(4), 955–968.

Curti, R. N., de la Vega, A. J., Andrade, A. J., Bramardi, S. J., & Bertero, H. D. (2016). Adaptive responses of quinoa to diverse agro-ecological environments along an altitudinal gradient in North West Argentina. Field Crops Research, 189, 10–18.

Deb, J. C., Phinn, S., Butt, N., & McAlpine, C. A. (2017). Climatic-Induced Shifts in the Distribution of Teak (Tectona grandis) in Tropical Asia: Implications for Forest Management and Planning. Environmental Management 2017 60:3, 60(3), 422–435.

Dolgener, N., Freudenberger, L., Schneeweiss, N., Ibisch, P. L., & Tiedemann, R. (2013). Projecting current and potential future distribution of the Fire-bellied toad Bombina bombina under climate change in north-eastern Germany. Regional Environmental Change 2013 14:3, 14(3), 1063–1072.

Ejigu, D., & Tassie, N. (2020). Present and future suitability of the Lake Tana Biosphere Reserve in Ethiopia for the Nile monitor (Varanus niloticus) using the MaxEnt model. Environmental Systems Research 2020 9:1, 9(1), 1–15.

Fagandini, F., Bazile, D., Drucker, A. G., Tapia, M., & Chura, E. (2020). Geographical distribution of quinoa crop wild relatives in the Peruvian Andes: a participatory mapping initiative. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–22.

Hu, Z., Guo, K., Jin, S., & Pan, H. (2018). The influence of climatic changes on distribution pattern of six typical Kobresia species in Tibetan Plateau based on MaxEnt model and geographic information system. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 2018 135:1, 135(1), 375–390.

Kibar, H., Sönmez, F., & Temel, S. (2021). Effect of storage conditions on nutritional quality and color characteristics of quinoa varieties. Journal of Stored Products Research, 91, 101761.

Lennox, E., & Gowdy, J. (2014). Ecosystem governance in a highland village in Peru: Facing the challenges of globalization and climate change. Ecosystem Services, 10, 155–163.

Lissovsky, A. A., & Dudov, S. V. (2021). Species-Distribution Modeling: Advantages and Limitations of Its Application. 2. MaxEnt. Biology Bulletin Reviews 2021 11:3, 11(3), 265–275.

López-Tirado, J., Vessella, F., Schirone, B., & Hidalgo, P. J. (2018). Trends in evergreen oak suitability from assembled species distribution models: assessing climate change in south-western Europe. New Forests 2018 49:4, 49(4), 471–487.

Miranda-Apodaca, J., Agirresarobe, A., Martínez-Goñi, X. S., Yoldi-Achalandabaso, A., & Pérez-López, U. (2020). N metabolism performance in Chenopodium quinoa subjected to drought or salt stress conditions. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 155, 725–734.

Muscolo, A., Panuccio, M. R., Gioffrè, A. M., & Jacobsen, S.-E. (2016). Drought and Salinity Differently Affect Growth and Secondary Metabolites of “Chenopodium quinoa Willd” Seedlings. In Halophytes for Food Security in Dry Lands (pp. 259–275). Elsevier.

Palit, P., Kudapa, H., Zougmore, R., Kholova, J., Whitbread, A., Sharma, M., & Varshney, R. K. (2020). An integrated research framework combining genomics, systems biology, physiology, modelling and breeding for legume improvement in response to elevated CO2 under climate change scenario. Current Plant Biology, 22, 100149.

Piedra-Bonilla, E. B., da Cunha, D. A., & Braga, M. J. (2020). Climate variability and crop diversification in Brazil: An ordered probit analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120252.

Ramzani, P. M. A., Shan, L., Anjum, S., Khan, W. ud D., Ronggui, H., et al. (2017). Improved quinoa growth, physiological response, and seed nutritional quality in three soils having different stresses by the application of acidified biochar and compost. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 116, 127–138.

Sellami, M. H., Pulvento, C., & Lavini, A. (2021). Agronomic practices and performances of quinoa under field conditions: A systematic review. In Plants (Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 1–20). MDPI AG.

Stevens, A. W. (2017). Quinoa quandary: Cultural tastes and nutrition in Peru. Food Policy, 71, 132–142.

Vacher, J. J. (1998). Responses of two main Andean crops, quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) and papa amarga (Solanum juzepczukii Buk.) to drought on the Bolivian Altiplano: Significance of local adaptation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 68(1–2), 99–108.

Valdez-Arana, J. del C., Steffolani, M. E., Repo-Carrasco-Valencia, R., Pérez, G. T., & Condezo-Hoyos, L. (2020). Physicochemical and functional properties of isolated starch and their correlation with flour from the Andean Peruvian quinoa varieties. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 147, 997–1007.

Yan, D., Chen, W., Liu, L., Li, J., Liu, L., & Wang, Y. (2017). Change in current and future geographic distributions of Ulmus lamellosa in China. Journal of Forestry Research 2017 29:4, 29(4), 1147–1156.

Zurita-Silva, A., Fuentes, F., Zamora, P., Jacobsen, S. E., & Schwember, A. R. (2014). Breeding quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): Potential and perspectives. Molecular Breeding, 34(1), 13–30.