Multifunctional effects of Trichoderma spp. and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on phytopathogen suppression and induction of plant defense responses

Authors

  • Claudia Regina Barbieri Federal University of Technology – Paraná (UTFPR), Paraná, Brazil.
  • Maira Cristina Schuster-Russiano SRM Brazil Technology, Startup incubated at the Federal University of Technology – Paraná (UTFPR), Paraná, Brazil.
  • Sérgio Miguel Mazaro Federal University of Technology – Paraná (UTFPR), Paraná, Brazil.
  • Lilian de Souza Vismara Federal University of Technology – Paraná (UTFPR), Paraná, Brazil.
  • Samara Bau Morgan Federal University of Technology – Paraná (UTFPR), Paraná, Brazil.
  • Camila Natacha Salvadori Federal University of Technology – Paraná (UTFPR), Paraná, Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17268/

Keywords:

beneficial microorganisms, induced resistance, hydrolytic enzymes, microbial antagonism, disease management

Abstract

Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) is one of the most important agricultural crops worldwide, and sustainable disease management is essential for maintaining productivity and environmental safety. This study evaluated the potential of a biological product composed of Trichoderma harzianum, Trichoderma asperellum, and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as a biocontrol agent, plant growth promoter, and inducer of defense responses in soybean. Experiments were conducted under laboratory, greenhouse, and field conditions, including in vitro antagonism assays against major soybean phytopathogens, seed physiological quality tests, plant growth analyses, assessment of biochemical defense responses, and evaluation of powdery mildew severity. Data were subjected to analysis of variance or non-parametric tests when appropriate. The biological agents exhibited high antagonistic activity against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Rhizoctonia solani, Macrophomina phaseolina, Diaporthe longicolla, and Fusarium tucumaniae, with distinct mechanisms of action among the microorganisms. Seed physiological quality and plant growth parameters were not significantly affected by the treatments. Biochemical analyses revealed increased chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase activities at specific evaluation periods. Under greenhouse conditions, the biological treatments reduced the powdery mildew progress rate, although complete disease suppression was not achieved. The biological product demonstrated consistent potential for antagonism against phytopathogens and induction of defense-related enzymes in soybean.

References

Abbas, A., Mubeen, M., Zheng, H., Sohail, M. A., Shakeel, Q., Solanki, M. K., Iftikhar, Y., Sharma, S., Kashyap, B. K., Hussain, S., del C., Zuñiga Romano, M., Moya-Elizondo, E. A., & Zhou, L. (2022). Trichoderma spp. genes involved in the biocontrol activity against Rhizoctonia solani. Front. Microbiol., 13, 884469. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.884469

Benítez, L. B. (2010). Characterization of antimicrobial peptides from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens with antibacterial, antifungal and amebicidal activity. Doctoral thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul [in Portuguese].

Bieleski, R. L., & Turner, N. A. (1966). Separation and estimation of amino acids in crude plant extracts by thin-layer electrophoresis and chromatography. Analytical Biochemistry, 17, 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(66)90206-5

Bohner, T. O. L., Araújo, L. E. B., & Nishijima, T. O. (2013). O impacto ambiental do uso de agrotóxicos no meio ambiente e na saúde dos trabalhadores rurais. Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito, 8, 329–341. https://doi.org/10.5902/198136948280

Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72, 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3

Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. (2009). Rules for seed analysis. Brasília: MAPA/ACS [in Portuguese].

CONAB – Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. (2023). Data table – grain production and supply/demand balance [in Portuguese].

Conover, W. J. (1999). Practical nonparametric statistics. Third Edition. Wiley.

Guzmán-Valle, P., Bravo-Luna, L., Montes-Belmont, R. et al. (2014). Induction of resistance to Sclerotium rolfsii in different varieties of onion by inoculation with Trichoderma asperellum. Eur J Plant Pathol, 138, 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-013-0336-y

Guzzo, S. D., & Martins, E. M. F. (1996). Local and systemic induction of β-1,3-glucanase and chitinase in coffee leaves protected against Hemileia vastatrix by Bacillus thuringiensis. Journal of Phytopathology, 144, 449–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.1996.tb00322.x

Harman, G., Howell, C., Viterbo, A. et al. (2004). Trichoderma species — opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro797

Mattiazzi, P. (2003). Efeito do oídio (Microsphaera diffusa Cooke & Peck) na produção e duração da área foliar sadia da soja. Master's dissertation – Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba.

Mayo, S., Gutiérrez, S., Malmierca, M. G., Lorenzana, A., Campelo, M. P., Hermosa, R., & Casquero, P. A. (2015). Influence of Rhizoctonia solani and Trichoderma spp. in growth of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and in the induction of plant defense-related genes. Front. Plant Sci., 6, 685. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00685

Muthukumar, A., & Venkatesh, A. (2014). Biological induction of systemic resistance to collar rot of peppermint caused by Sclerotium rolfsii. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 36, 1421–1431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-014-1520-1

Nakagawa, J. et al. (1999). Seed vigor analysis methods. In: Krzyzanowski, F. C., Vieira, R. D., França Neto, J. B. (ed.). Vigor de Sementes: Conceitos e Testes. Londrina: Abrastes. p. 1–24.

Ribeiro, M. S. (2017). Estudo funcional do gene gluc31 que codifica uma β-1,3-glucanase da família GH16 de Trichoderma harzianum. Doctoral thesis – Universidade Federal de Goiás.

Sarocco, S., Guidi, L., Simona, F., & Degl'Innocenti, E. (2009). Competition for cellulose exploitation between Rhizoctonia solani and two Trichoderma isolates in the decomposition of wheat straw. Journal of Plant Pathology, 91(2), 331-338.

Sharma, P., & Sain, S. K. (2004). Induction of systemic resistance in tomato and cauliflower by Trichoderma spp. against stalk rot pathogen, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib) de Bary. Journal of Biological Control, 18(1), 21-28.

Silva, L. G., Camargo, R. C., Mascarin, G. M., Nunes, P. S. O., Dunlap, C., & Bettiol, W. (2022). Dual functionality of Trichoderma: biocontrol of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and biostimulant of cotton plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 983127. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.983127

Singh, B. N., Singh, A., Singh, B. R., & Singh, H. B. (2014). Trichoderma harzianum elicits induced resistance in sunflower challenged by Rhizoctonia solani. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 116(3), 654-666. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12387

Sumida, C. H., Daniel, J. F. S., Araujod, A. P. C. S., Peitl, D. C., Abreu, L. M., Dekker, R. F. H., & Canteri, M. G. (2018). Trichoderma asperelloides antagonism to nine Sclerotinia sclerotiorum strains and biological control of white mold disease in soybean plants. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 28(2), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2018.1430743

Torres, M. J., Pérez Brandan, C., Petroselli, G., Erra-Balsells, R., & Audisio, M. C. (2016). Antagonistic effects of Bacillus spp. against Macrophomina phaseolina. Microbiological Research, 182, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2015.09.005

Tyśkiewicz, R., Nowak, A., Ozimek, E., & Jaroszuk-Ściseł, J. (2022). Trichoderma: current status in agriculture for biocontrol and plant growth stimulation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(4), 2329. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042329

Vismara, E. S. (2019). Óleos essenciais na indução de resistência em morangos ao mofo cinzento, à Botrytis cinerea in vitro e ação toxicológica. Doctoral thesis – UTFPR.

Wirth, S., & Wolf, G. (1992). Micro-plate colourimetric assay for cellulase, xylanase, chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 24, 511–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(92)90074-8

Wróbel-Kwiatkowska, M., Lorenc-Kukula, K., Starzycki, M., Oszmiański, J., Kepczyńska, E., & Szopa, J. (2004). Expression of β-1,3-glucanase in flax increases fungal resistance. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 65, 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2005.02.008

Xu, J., Zhang, N., Wang, K., Xian, Q., Dong, J., Qi, X., & Chen, X. (2022). Chitinase Chi 2 positively regulates cucumber resistance against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum. Genes, 13(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13010062.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-27

Issue

Section

Artículos de investigación

How to Cite

Multifunctional effects of Trichoderma spp. and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on phytopathogen suppression and induction of plant defense responses. (2026). Agroindustrial Science, 16(3), 401-410. https://doi.org/10.17268/