Price volatility and quinoa consumption among smallholder producers in the Andes

Cindybell Gamboa, Monica Schuster, Eddie Schrevens, Miet Maertens

Resumen


The recent attention to quinoa as a nutritious food is changing the way the crop is produced and consumed by smallholders in the Andes. Price spikes and increased volatility in international quinoa prices have created a concern about quinoa consumption among Andean farm-households. The farm-household theory was used to investigate how food price changes affect household consumption and production decisions. Theoretical predictions were applied to original survey data from a quinoa-producing region of Peru. Findings suggest that the global quinoa hype and consequent price spikes did not adversely affect the consumption of this nutritious food among quinoa producers.


Palabras clave


Farm-household model; food consumption; Peru; price elasticity; quinoa.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referencias


Ahn, Y.C.; Singh, I.; Squire, L. 1981. A Model of an Agricultural Household in a Multi-Crop Economy: The Case of Korea. The Review of Economics and Statistics 63: 520-525.

Alem, Y.; Söderbom, M. 2012. Household-Level Consumption in Urban Ethiopia: The Effects of a Large Food Price Shock. World Development 40: 146-162.

Apaza, V.; Cáceres, G.; Estrada, R.; Pinedo, R. 2015. Catalogue of commercial varieties of quinoa in Perú. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Lima. 71 pp.

Attanasio, O.; Di Maro, V.; Lechene, V.; Phillips, D. 2013. Welfare consequences of food prices increases: Evidence from rural Mexico. Journal of Development Economics 104: 136-151.

Balagtas, J. V.; Bhandari, H.; Cabrera, E.R.; Mohanty, S.; Hossain, M. 2014. Did the commodity price spike increase rural poverty? Evidence from a long-run panel in Bangladesh. Agricultural Economics 45: 303-312.

Barnum, H.N.; Squire, L. 1979. An Econometric Application of the Theory. Journal of Development Economics 6: 79-102.

Bazile, D.; Bertero, D.; Nieto, C. 2015. State of the Art Report on Quinoa around the World in 2013. Editorial Rome. 586 pp.

Bellemare, M.; Gitter, S.; Kasterine, A.; Obregon, E.; Zotz, A. 2016. Trade in quinoa: impact on the welfare of peruvian communities. International Trade Centre, Geneva, Switzerland.

Blythman, J. 2013. Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? The Guardian, 16 January.

Dimova, R. 2015. The welfare impact of rising food prices. IZA World Labor 135: 1-10.

Dimova, R.; Gbakou, M.; 2013. The Global Food Crisis: Disaster, Opportunity or Non-event? Household Level Evidence from Côte d’Ivoire. World Development 46: 185-196.

Dobkin, L. 2008. Quinoa comeback: a staple in Inca times, this nutritious, versatile “super food” is undergoing a resurgence in the Andes and beyond. Americas 60: 28-37.

DRAJ, 2018. Time Series of Agricultural Production. Available at: http://www.agrojunin.gob.pe/?page_id=356.

Ellis, F. 1993. Peasant economics: Farm households in agrarian development. 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 328 pp.

Escuredo, O.; González Martín, M.I.; Wells Moncada, G.; Fischer, S.; Hernández Hierro, J.M. 2014. Amino acid profile of the quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) using near infrared spectroscopy and chemometric techniques. Journal of Cereal Science 60: 67-74.

Friedman-Rudovsky, J. 2012. Quinoa: The dark side of an Andean superfood. TIME, 3 April.

Hadley, C.; Stevenson, E.G.J.; Tadesse, Y.; Belachew, T. 2012. Rapidly rising food prices and the experience of food insecurity in urban Ethiopia: Impacts on health and well-being. Social Science and Medicine 75: 2412-2419.

Harttgen, K.; Klasen, S.; Rischke, R. 2016. Analyzing nutritional impacts of price and income related shocks in Malawi: Simulating household entitlements to food. Food Policy 60: 31-43.

Hasan, S.A. 2016. The impact of the 2005-2010 rice price increase on consumption in rural Bangladesh. Agricultural Economics 47: 423-433.

Hellin, J.; Higman, S. 2005. Crop diversity and livelihood security in the Andes. Development in Practice 15: 165-174.

Jacobsen, S.E. 2011. The Situation for Quinoa and Its Production in Southern Bolivia: From Economic Success to Environmental Disaster. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 197: 390-399.

Jacobsen, S.E. 2003. The Worldwide Potential for Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Reviews International 19: 167-177.

Kerssen, T.M. 2015. Food sovereignty and the quinoa boom: challenges to sustainable re-peasantisation in the southern Altiplano of Bolivia. Third World Quarterly 36: 489-507.

Lau, L.J.; Lin, W.-L.; Yotopoulos, P.A. 1978. The Linear Logarithmic Expenditure System: an Application to Consumption-Leisure Choice. Econometrica 46: 843-868.

Lester, G.E. 2006. Organic versus conventionally grown produce: Quality differences, and guidelines for comparison studies. HortScience 41: 296-300.

Lira, L.; Quiroga, B. 2009. Técnicas de análisis regional, Serie Manuales No 59. Santiago de Chile.

Macedo, G.A. 2003. Consumption of quinoa in Peru. Food Reviews International 19: 221-227.

Mghenyi, E.; Myers, R.J.; Jayne, T.S. 2011. The effects of a large discrete maize price increase on the distribution of household welfare and poverty in rural Kenya1. Agricultural Economics 42: 343-356.

MINAGRI, 2018. Time Series of Agricultural Production. Available at: http://frenteweb.minagri.gob.pe/sisca/?mod=consulta_cult.

Noratto, G.D.; Murphy, K.; Chew, B.P. 2019. Quinoa intake reduces plasma and liver cholesterol, lessens obesity-associated inflammation, and helps to prevent hepatic steatosis in obese db/db mouse. Food Chemistry 287: 107-114.

Nowak, V.; Du, J.; Charrondière, U.R. 2016. Assessment of the nutritional composition of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Chemistry 193: 47-54.

Ofstehage, A. 2012. The construction of an alternative quinoa economy: Balancing solidarity, household needs, and profit in San Agustín, Bolivia. Agriculture and Human Values 29: 441-454.

Quayes, S.; Rashid, S. 2008. Linkage Between Production and Consumption of an Agricultural Household. The Journal of Developing Areas 42: 117-134.

Repo-Carrasco, R.; Espinoza, C.; Jacobsen, S.-E. 2003. Nutritional Value and Use of the Andean Crops Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) and Kañiwa (Chenopodium pallidicaule). Food Reviews International 19: 179-189.

Ruiz, K.B.; Biondi, S.; Oses, R.; Acuña-Rodríguez, I.S.; Antognoni, F.; Martinez-Mosqueira, E.A.; Coulibaly, A.; Canahua-Murillo, A.; Pinto, M.; Zurita-Silva, A.; Bazile, D.; Jacobsen, S-E.; Molina-Montenegro, M.A. 2014. Quinoa biodiversity and sustainability for food security under climate change. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 34: 349-359.

Stevens, A.W. 2017. Quinoa quandary: Cultural tastes and nutrition in Peru. Food Policy 71: 132-142.

Strauss, J. 1984. Joint determination of food consumption and production in rural Sierra Leone. Estimates of a household-firm model. Journal of Development Economics 14: 77-103.

Taylor, J.E.; Adelman, I. 2002. Agricultural Household Models: Genesis, Evolution, and Extensions. Review of Economics of the Household 1: 33-58.

Vega-Gálvez, A.; Miranda, M.; Vergara, J.; Uribe, E.; Puente, L.; Martínez, E.A. 2010. Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.), an ancient Andean grain: A review. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 90: 2541-2547.

Verner, A. 2013. The more you love quinoa, the more you hurt Peruvians and Bolivians. The Globe and Mail, 16 January.

Verpoorten, M.; Arora, A.; Stoop, N.; Swinnen, J. 2013. Self-reported food insecurity in Africa during the food price crisis. Food Policy 39: 51-63.

Zezza, A.; Davis, B.; Azzarri, C.; Covarrubias, K.; Tasciotti, L.; Anriquez, G. 2008. The Impact of Rising Food Prices on the Poor, Working paper, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2020.01.13

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Indizada o resumida en:

           

  

      

            

    

     

   

                             

 

Scientia Agropecuria fue admitida en SCOPUS en noviembre 2019, por lo que los contenidos publicados a partir del 2019 en adelante, serán indizados en esta base de datos. 

 

Licencia de Creative Commons Scientia Agropecuaria, revista de la Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, publica sus contenidos bajo licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 3.0.

ISSN: 2306-6741 (electrónico); 2077-9917 (impreso)
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu

Dirección: Av Juan Pablo II s/n. Ciudad Universitaria. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias. Universidad Nacional de Trujillo. Trujillo, Perú.
Contactosci.agropecu@unitru.edu.pe